JamesB
Regular Member
This was just on my local news here in Colorado. Apearently history lessons actually will be repeated untill learned?
Sympathies.
Sympathies.
I didn't have class today, but I have at least one buddy in lockdown on campus. This buddy is pissed he has been left defenseless. I would be too.
Personally, I think the school should be sued. This is far from the ideal case, however. And god forbid an ideal one ever comes along again.
The Collegiate Times is going to try to live tweet the press conference that is scheduled for 4:30PM
One thing I would like to know is what happens to all the students who are outside when the buildings are locked down? Are they stuck outside or are allowed into a building after a pat down?
The Collegiate Times is going to try to live tweet the press conference that is scheduled for 4:30PM
One thing I would like to know is what happens to all the students who are outside when the buildings are locked down? Are they stuck outside or are allowed into a building after a pat down?
In the face of another campus murder spree, these folks STILL just don't get it.
From the USA Today coverage:
Well I'll tell you, you smart University student:
It's called Gun Control: "A theory espoused by some monumentally stupid people who claim to believe, against all logic and common sense, that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from robbing, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them that they cannot own [or in this case carry] a gun [on campus]." -- Oldnoob
TFred
Personally I'd rather be "trapped" outside. If they ever announce "student lockdown for safety," I'm outa there.
How many times have we said (recently on the VT campus) "...if only there had been someone there with a gun..."? Well, today there was, and he was the ideal armed respondent, to wit a police officer, who was killed by the very gunman that we all hoped he'd be able to stop...
So I guess that begs the question: "If he couldn't stop the assailant, why do we think that an armed student would fare any better?". It's a certainty that the No Guns On Campus policy didn't phase him one bit, nor did it help the dead policeman or student.
And of course there are the yet-to-be-answered questions of "Where did he get the gun?" and "Did he have a CHP?"
Pushing that rock up the hill of self defense just got a lot harder.
How many times have we said (recently on the VT campus) "...if only there had been someone there with a gun..."? Well, today there was, and he was the ideal armed respondent, to wit a police officer, who was killed by the very gunman that we all hoped he'd be able to stop...
So I guess that begs the question: "If he couldn't stop the assailant, why do we think that an armed student would fare any better?". It's a certainty that the No Guns On Campus policy didn't phase him one bit, nor did it help the dead policeman or student.
And of course there are the yet-to-be-answered questions of "Where did he get the gun?" and "Did he have a CHP?"
Pushing that rock up the hill of self defense just got a lot harder.
At the risk of contradicting myself, I think your description is the likely scenario, and if it had happened anywhere else, we wouldn't be talking about it.Not really. The "armed respondent" was a cop carrying out a traffic stop, an event which probably precipitated this whole affair.
The shooter was probably a drug dealer, or wanted for a recent crime. This happens all the time, and it has nothing to do with citizen self-defense, or with shooting sprees, or anything except for some dude trying to avoid being arrested.