hermannr
Regular Member
OK guys...I obviously am not getting anywhere discussing this with you guys. I don't know where you misunderstandings come form, but I want to go to the horses mouth.
Could you please post the email address of your BEST OC supporter in your State legislature and senate?
Two email addresses are enough. One of each.
There are two things I wish to ask them.
Question #1: Do they think that changing the wording 21-1272 to match the wording in 21-1290.4 by adding the word "concealed" to 21-1272... do they think that would fix the whole OC question> do they think that one word "correction" would make it. Bill verbage something like, to add the word "concealed to 21-2172 so as to make 21-1272 and 21-1290.4 read the same. Present condition, 21-1290.4 quotes 21-1272 but has an added the word concealed. This bill would correct this by also adding the work concealed to 21-1272 (Concealed is already implied) This would also correct a possible constitutional problem with 1272
Question #2: Does or does not 21-1290.22(a) allow for a persons right to carry as the property owner pleases on his own property, or as an invited guest on another's personal property, (as in OK state constitution Artical 2 Section 24)? That is: a person may Carry a firearm, loaded or unloaded, open or conceal, as they please, on their own private property as stated in 21-1290.22(A)
Could you please post the email address of your BEST OC supporter in your State legislature and senate?
Two email addresses are enough. One of each.
There are two things I wish to ask them.
Question #1: Do they think that changing the wording 21-1272 to match the wording in 21-1290.4 by adding the word "concealed" to 21-1272... do they think that would fix the whole OC question> do they think that one word "correction" would make it. Bill verbage something like, to add the word "concealed to 21-2172 so as to make 21-1272 and 21-1290.4 read the same. Present condition, 21-1290.4 quotes 21-1272 but has an added the word concealed. This bill would correct this by also adding the work concealed to 21-1272 (Concealed is already implied) This would also correct a possible constitutional problem with 1272
Question #2: Does or does not 21-1290.22(a) allow for a persons right to carry as the property owner pleases on his own property, or as an invited guest on another's personal property, (as in OK state constitution Artical 2 Section 24)? That is: a person may Carry a firearm, loaded or unloaded, open or conceal, as they please, on their own private property as stated in 21-1290.22(A)