• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Menomonee Falls to Ban Concealed Weapons from Municipal Buildings

Badger Johnson

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
1,213
Location
USA

protias

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
7,308
Location
SE, WI
"A violator of the ordinances could be cited if he or she refuses to leave the building."

To me that says, in absence of metal detectors, that there is no reason to be unduly concerned with this ordinance.

Except it would still be against the ordinance (law).
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
"A violator of the ordinances could be cited if he or she refuses to leave the building."

To me that says, in absence of metal detectors, that there is no reason to be unduly concerned with this ordinance.

"No reason to be unduly concerned" - really?

(15) WE ADVOCATE FOR THE 'LAW-ABIDING' ONLY: Posts advocating illegal acts of any kind are NOT welcome here. Even if you feel that a law is unconstitutional we do not break it, we repeal it or defeat it in the courts.
 
Top