Castle Doctrine Published Today! Goes Into Effect Tomorrow The 21st!

Rcrawdor57, missed that, my bad, still...

rcawdor57 said:

Dennis, here is a small part of the Castle Doctrine as pertains to civil liability:

(2) Except as provided in sub. (4), an actor is immune
from civil liability arising out of his or her use of force
that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily
harm if the actor reasonably believed that the force was
necessary to prevent imminent death or bodily harm to
himself or herself or to another person and either of the
following applies:

We have protection from civil liabilities within the scope of the Castle Doctrine.

Click to expand...

...we sail in uncharted waters. Take a look at what was just released by the DOJ on time of detention by non LEOs. Ten minutes, what the hell happens after that? I'm not sure, but I would imagine it involves the ACLU, and unlawful detention, any move we make will cost us out of pocket. Wisconsin is being treated like it's the first State to allow the carrying of side arms, and the DOJ acts like there is no time tested precedent anywhere. I'm not rich, I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not willing to go to prison. These are the reasons I say "FIGHT THE LAW NOW" It is written, but not understood by the people. How can we be compliant to something we don't know? boar out.