Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruins again...

  1. #1
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,787

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruins again...

    "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated." - Source

    It boiled down to the appeals court "ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations."

    So, an illegally-sitting president whose verified hell-bent actions to bankrupt the U.S. Economy as a means of introducing socialism, at a cost of between $15,000 and $30,000 to each and every resident of the United States of America, for a total cost of around $5 TRILLION, fails their "concrete injury" test.

    Hmm...

    What did they do? Drop the filed papers on a dog and say, "Nope. Didn't cause nearly enough damage as would have a chunk of concrete."
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and our United States Constitution, and help We the People protect ourselves in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,546
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    So, an illegally-sitting president whose verified hell-bent actions to bankrupt the U.S. Economy
    I don't think that word means what you think it does.
    "If we were to ever consider citizenship as the least bit matter of merit instead of birthright, imagine who should be selected as deserved representation of our democracy: someone who would risk their daily livelihood to cast an individually statistically insignificant vote, or those who wrap themselves in the flag against slightest slights." - agenthex

  3. #3
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated." - Source

    It boiled down to the appeals court "ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations."

    So, an illegally-sitting president whose verified hell-bent actions to bankrupt the U.S. Economy as a means of introducing socialism, at a cost of between $15,000 and $30,000 to each and every resident of the United States of America, for a total cost of around $5 TRILLION, fails their "concrete injury" test.

    Hmm...

    What did they do? Drop the filed papers on a dog and say, "Nope. Didn't cause nearly enough damage as would have a chunk of concrete."
    This is the 9th Circus Court... you're suprised? You could show them a film of obozo being born in Kenya and delivered by Kruschev followed by a satanic ritual and they would instruct the US Marshals too seize it on copyright infringement grounds.

    With that said I doubt obozo was born in kenya, or anywhere outside of Hawaii. I haven't seen a piece of legitamate evidence too the contrary, though I haven't seen much to verify it either. Regardless, even if overwhelming evidence was entered into court and the judges ruled him an illegal occupant we would never in our lifetimes see everything he's done to us reversed in court. It has too be done by an overwhelming majority in both houses and in the WH.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  4. #4
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,787
    Quote Originally Posted by PrayingForWar View Post
    With that said I doubt obozo was born in kenya, or anywhere outside of Hawaii. I haven't seen a piece of legitamate evidence too the contrary, though I haven't seen much to verify it either. Regardless, even if overwhelming evidence was entered into court and the judges ruled him an illegal occupant we would never in our lifetimes see everything he's done to us reversed in court. It has too be done by an overwhelming majority in both houses and in the WH.
    Agreed, although if it ever were proven for him to have been ineligible, his retirement would disappear. Don't think they'd ask him to return his pay while in office, though.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and our United States Constitution, and help We the People protect ourselves in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.

  5. #5
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    Agreed, although if it ever were proven for him to have been ineligible, his retirement would disappear. Don't think they'd ask him to return his pay while in office, though.

    Or send him to prison right along with every buearucrat that should have checked him out.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •