since9
Campaign Veteran
"The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated." - Source
It boiled down to the appeals court "ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations."
So, an illegally-sitting president whose verified hell-bent actions to bankrupt the U.S. Economy as a means of introducing socialism, at a cost of between $15,000 and $30,000 to each and every resident of the United States of America, for a total cost of around $5 TRILLION, fails their "concrete injury" test.
Hmm...
What did they do? Drop the filed papers on a dog and say, "Nope. Didn't cause nearly enough damage as would have a chunk of concrete." :banghead:
It boiled down to the appeals court "ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations."
So, an illegally-sitting president whose verified hell-bent actions to bankrupt the U.S. Economy as a means of introducing socialism, at a cost of between $15,000 and $30,000 to each and every resident of the United States of America, for a total cost of around $5 TRILLION, fails their "concrete injury" test.
Hmm...
What did they do? Drop the filed papers on a dog and say, "Nope. Didn't cause nearly enough damage as would have a chunk of concrete." :banghead: