wrightme
Regular Member
NO ONE in this thread is actually discussing 'carrying assault rifles.' That is a false construct.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Are y'all ready for kwikrnu's open carry visit to the legislature?
- Thread starter RussP
- Start date
wrightme
Regular Member
LOL, then you haven't been in some CC-OC conversations. Many CC-only persons really DO argue exactly as you are about how OC is abusing your right to carry. That is a fact. Any argument you make about it simply because you haven't yet experienced that attitude fails to present reality.
And, it isn't an 'assault pistol,' no matter how often you want to use 'scary words' to define his firearm choice. The more you keep trotting that out on YOUR high horse, the more others will point out your error.
If pointing out my typos is the best form of rebuttal for you, I suggest disregarding the rest of this thread.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
Reference §HRS 134-1
"Assault pistol" means a semiautomatic pistol which accepts a detachable magazine and which has two or more of the following characteristics:
(1) An ammunition magazine which attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
(2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward hand grip, or silencer;
(3) A shroud which is attached to or partially or completely encircles the barrel and which permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the second hand without being burned;
(4) A manufactured weight of fifty ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded;
(5) A centerfire pistol with an overall length of twelve inches or more; or
(6) It is a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm;
but does not include a firearm with a barrel sixteen or more inches in length, an antique pistol as defined in this section or a curio or relic as those terms are used in 18 United States Code §921(16) or 27 Code of Federal Regulations 178.11.
carsontech
Activist Member
keltec said:
Some of us may look as if we're coming off as condescending, but you seem to taking it to a new level. Calm down, bra.
Your repeated use of the words "stupid", "retarded", and other negative personality adjectives make you look immature and aggravated.
Last edited:
flb_78
Regular Member
So, by definition, a Ruger Charger is an evil assault pistol?
Meh, I've open carried at the State Capitol along with others, some of which were even carrying long guns. Not a big deal in Kentucky.
As long as Leonard is breaking no laws, I support him.
KelTec, you've been carrying all of 4 days now. Please don't judge others until you've walked in an open carrier's shoes for at least a week.
Meh, I've open carried at the State Capitol along with others, some of which were even carrying long guns. Not a big deal in Kentucky.
As long as Leonard is breaking no laws, I support him.
KelTec, you've been carrying all of 4 days now. Please don't judge others until you've walked in an open carrier's shoes for at least a week.
John Canuck
Regular Member
Is kwikrnu going to Hawaii?
The use of scary names for guns to which those names do not apply is silly. Enough said.
I find those shouting about others who "abuse" rights to be lacking an understanding of what rights are.
The use of scary names for guns to which those names do not apply is silly. Enough said.
I find those shouting about others who "abuse" rights to be lacking an understanding of what rights are.
I am legally allowed to express my opinion and am not judging Leonard. Open Carry in Kentucky is much easier than in Tennessee, and this I do understand.
I was merely pointing out there is such thing as an "assault pistol." Don't start calling me out little man, you don't want to get me started.
wrightme
Regular Member
Calling an AR-15 an 'assault rifle' is false. Pointing that out isn't 'pointing out [your] typos.'
Calling an AR-15 pistol an 'assault pistol' is false. Pointing that out isn't 'pointing out [your] typos.'
Being insulting and argumentative does nothing towards actual communication.
Last edited:
John Canuck
Regular Member
You're joking right?
Last edited:
wrightme
Regular Member
It isn't an embarrassment at all to disagree with false definitions created by some legislative body.
wrightme
Regular Member
Your first amendment right isn't applicable here, on the property of someone else.
carsontech
Activist Member
How dare you make such a statement. I suggest you eat a crab cake and relax, little man.
wrightme
Regular Member
It is easy to make a statement of fact. It seems to only be easy for you to insult others. If you do desire to remain an active member on this property of another, I suggest you back off of the insults.
John Canuck
Regular Member
How did he know you were short, little man!?
I think he has a projection issue, along with some others.
Last edited:
If you honestly believe I'm giving up my fist amendment rights because of some forum, you're out of your mind.
