Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Single Okla Mom Shoots Intruder

  1. #1
    Campaign Veteran Schlitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,567

    Post Single Okla Mom Shoots Intruder

    JOURNALISM FAIL

    Headling: Okla. Woman Shoots, Kills Intruder: 911 Operators Say It's Okay to Shoot


    What was actually said
    she asked again if it was okay to shoot the intruder if he were to come through her door.

    "I can't tell you that you can do that but you do what you have to do to protect your baby," the dispatcher told her. McKinley was on the phone with 911 for a total of 21 minutes.
    http://gma.yahoo.com/okla-woman-shoo...091106413.html

    More stupid words, these form the mother.

    I wouldn't have done it, but it was my son
    She was explaning that she would not have stopped the home intruders if she didn't have her son with her. I don't get it. She'd rather be raped, killed, or beaten (or all 3) instead of shooting someone who was going to do these things to her? I can only assume the intent of the intruders was evil since they were you know, BREAKING INTO HER HOME. Some people's kids.
    “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”
    [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. Supp. 486, 489 (1956)]
    “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.”
    [Sherar vs. Cullen, 481 F2d. 946 (1973)]

  2. #2
    Regular Member okiebryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Director, Oklahoma Open Carry Association
    Posts
    449
    There's already a thread about this here: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...kills-intruder

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran Schlitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,567
    impossible! lol, I skimmed through the forum and swear that thread wasn't already there.
    “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”
    [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. Supp. 486, 489 (1956)]
    “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.”
    [Sherar vs. Cullen, 481 F2d. 946 (1973)]

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Campaign Veteran Schlitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,567
    Quote Originally Posted by Herr Heckler Koch View Post
    well at least mine was up before this one XD
    “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”
    [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. Supp. 486, 489 (1956)]
    “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.”
    [Sherar vs. Cullen, 481 F2d. 946 (1973)]

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,929
    Must've been some worm-hole thread posting going on...

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,510
    The first thread on this topic is here, in True Tales of Self Defense:

    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...kills-intruder

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Schlitz View Post
    iMpoZZible!!!! I sKIMmEd tHROugh TEh fOruuM EnD sWeAr tHAt thReDe wASint AlReaDy ThErE. Must be my EyES, 2 P00R 2 AffORd DEsinT GlAsseS, bUT MoSt liKEly nEeeD a bBraaaaiN and Eye 5Urgery

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •