Anybody have any updates?

jim8588 said:

Have there been any updates on Peruta v. San Diego or if this court case will force the state into a "shall issue" state? I would imagine it will be come even more relevant if all open carry is outlawed in Ca. Or if anybody has any updates at all regarding OC or CCW I'd love to hear them.

Thanks in advance.

Click to expand...

slapmonkay said:

I have been tracking CA updates from here: http://californiafrighttocarry.org/

A little down the page they have press releases.

Click to expand...

ConditionThree said:

There isnt any 'new' news on Peruta, or Richards just yet. If you want accurate information on status of any pending relevant court cases you can get it here... http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Litigation_Past_and_Present



While there are 'articles' there these are all written by Charles Nichols who has taken it upon himself to file suit in a jurisdiction that is not likely to rule favorably and at a time where we do not enjoy a fully fleshed out right to 'carry' in California. I, and many others do not support this move at this time and I am suspicious of the motives in this particular fundraising campaign. Mr. Nichols himself has indicated to the press that counsel is working on his case pro bono, while at the same time anyone reading his filing can see that he filed pro-per. If either were true- he would either have no need to for others to fund his litigation or is relying solely upon the generosity of strangers to fund what he should have been prepared to pay for out of his own pocket, before filing a suit that he had no financial ability to propel to its conclusion.

Click to expand...

ConditionThree said:

While there are 'articles' there these are all written by Charles Nichols who has taken it upon himself to file suit in a jurisdiction that is not likely to rule favorably and at a time where we do not enjoy a fully fleshed out right to 'carry' in California. I, and many others do not support this move at this time and I am suspicious of the motives in this particular fundraising campaign. Mr. Nichols himself has indicated to the press that counsel is working on his case pro bono, while at the same time anyone reading his filing can see that he filed pro-per. If either were true- he would either have no need to for others to fund his litigation or is relying solely upon the generosity of strangers to fund what he should have been prepared to pay for out of his own pocket, before filing a suit that he had no financial ability to propel to its conclusion.

Click to expand...