I'm going to do something for you that I've never done before. I'm going to attempt to get you links to the articles that I was speaking of and one that I saw on
www.injusticeeverywhere.com concerning NYC having to shell out around 15 million for continuing to charge, try, and convict people of loitering after the law was repealed in 2010, but I'm not going to do it right now, cause I don't rally know how, but for you, I'm a fixin' to learn.
You've got good questions, trouble is, they really need to be directed at the states, the courts, and the judges. Last time I checked they weren't very receptive to questions about their illegal behaviors. I'm going to say that my perspective is that the "Justice" system does pretty much whatever it wants to as long as no one bucks them on it. I doubt very seriously if the very vast majority of those convicted had any real legal representation, for whatever reason, be it financial or other. Now witness the Surry case with Skidmark. Were it not for the a number of things in Skid's favor, things could have been much worse than they were, and some of the things were that he had excellent legal representation by User, a member here, great support financially and morally from this OC community, and just as important, the will to stand up to government corruption and abuse, DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE WAS INNOCENT!!!
I'll get those links for you, Difdi, because..., I'm relentless.
sidestreet
Jeremiah 29 vs. 11-13
we are not equal, we will never be equal, but we must be relentless.