since9
Campaign Veteran
Here.
Please DO NOT simply forward this e-mail. Instead, sanitize it. This isn't to hide anything, but doing so respects the privacy of those who may desire not to have anything to do with this issue. If, after carefully evaluating the information below you choose to pass this on, please remove the sender's information, and use the BCC: (blind carbon copy) function of your e-mail client. Thank you.
Interestingly enough, you can still download the PDF online (Attachment 1, but you can follow the White House Website link if you'd prefer to get it from the source). Try looking at different elements at about 800% (Attachment 2).
While the fact that it's layered is a dead give-away that it's a forgery, there are other clues to the fact that it's a hoax, as well:
The most telling thing you can see for yourself is how the pixelation resolution varies between different portions of the document. The reason the pixelation rate varies between different elements is because different elements were scanned in separately, at different resolutions, before behind added to the final product in different layers.
The other tell-tale is that the black color for different heavy-line elements is different between layers. This is so obvious one can see it with the naked eye, but anyone with a color picker in, say, Irfanview, MS Paint, Photoshop, or any other program can spot this a mile a way, as well.
A more subtle sub-element tell-tale is that for the heavy-line elements, some of them have been "flattened," that is, all the pixels on elements of the same layer are of the same color, while others from other elements are in a slightly different shade. Some elements are single-color, while others vary somewhat in their range of pixel color. Anyone with basic experience with Photoshop and layering can attest to this.
If the document were scanned, the pixelation resolution, the black density, and the color space would be the same throughout the document, and the document itself would be a single, layer-free image. That none of these three issues are the case, along with the documents multiple layers, clearly and irrefutably attests to the fact that various elements of the document were scanned in, added layer by layer in a program like Photoshop, to produce a final, somewhat authentic-looking document...
...with more than a few bread crumbs attesting to its electronic forgery.
Bottom line, Obama's Birth Certificate, the one you can download yourself right off the White House Website is indeed a hoax. No scanner or post-processing software would (or even can) produce these artifacts from a single scan. The only way for these artifacts to have been created are by scanning multiple elements in at different resolutions, and with the color space of some elements having been significantly compressed (2 or 4-color), and in different color spaces at that, with other elements having far greater range of colors. That's a fancy way of saying "It was faked using layering technology of Adobe Photoshop or a similar graphics manipulation program."
So - someone knew Photoshop (or similar) well enough to use it's layering capabilities, but not enough to hide the trail of breadcrumbs. My question is: "Was the trail of breadcrumbs the work of a novice, or did the graphic artist have enough integrity to leave the trail on purpose in the hopes the lid on this fraud would one day be blown wide open?"
What does this mean/prove? All it proves, really, is that someone, somewhere, manufactured his long form and knowingly passed it off as the original, and that it sits on the White House website for everyone to download and verify for themselves. Who dunnit? It was either the White House, the hospital in Hawaii, or someone they contracted to do so. I seriously doubt it was the work of a third party, as either the White House or the Hospital would have rejected it. Regardless, if that hospital authenticated it, they're either the originators, or they're complicit with the White House. It does not prove that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii. They did, after all, produce a "short form." That's easily faked, however, which is why everyone was clamoring for the long form. It does not prove Obama was born in Kenya, although there are many websites, including this one, which show one or more copies/versions of his Kenyan birth certificate. SNOPES says that's a hoax, but I ask you to keep two things in mind. First, SNOPES is owned and run by two extreme liberals. Second, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., is the one who is bringing the issue of the Kenyan birth certificate into the national spotlight, and her case is being heard TODAY by Judge Michael Malihi in an Alabama State Administrative Court. You can read Obama's disdainful response for yourselves.
This still leaves us with three questions:
1. "Why fake it at all?"
2. "Why commit such a high crime / misdemeanor?"
3. Does the degree of deception warrant a much further, deeper level of investigation, and if evidence is found which demands charges be levied, isn't it about time impeachment proceedings begin?
Please DO NOT simply forward this e-mail. Instead, sanitize it. This isn't to hide anything, but doing so respects the privacy of those who may desire not to have anything to do with this issue. If, after carefully evaluating the information below you choose to pass this on, please remove the sender's information, and use the BCC: (blind carbon copy) function of your e-mail client. Thank you.
Interestingly enough, you can still download the PDF online (Attachment 1, but you can follow the White House Website link if you'd prefer to get it from the source). Try looking at different elements at about 800% (Attachment 2).
While the fact that it's layered is a dead give-away that it's a forgery, there are other clues to the fact that it's a hoax, as well:
The most telling thing you can see for yourself is how the pixelation resolution varies between different portions of the document. The reason the pixelation rate varies between different elements is because different elements were scanned in separately, at different resolutions, before behind added to the final product in different layers.
The other tell-tale is that the black color for different heavy-line elements is different between layers. This is so obvious one can see it with the naked eye, but anyone with a color picker in, say, Irfanview, MS Paint, Photoshop, or any other program can spot this a mile a way, as well.
A more subtle sub-element tell-tale is that for the heavy-line elements, some of them have been "flattened," that is, all the pixels on elements of the same layer are of the same color, while others from other elements are in a slightly different shade. Some elements are single-color, while others vary somewhat in their range of pixel color. Anyone with basic experience with Photoshop and layering can attest to this.
If the document were scanned, the pixelation resolution, the black density, and the color space would be the same throughout the document, and the document itself would be a single, layer-free image. That none of these three issues are the case, along with the documents multiple layers, clearly and irrefutably attests to the fact that various elements of the document were scanned in, added layer by layer in a program like Photoshop, to produce a final, somewhat authentic-looking document...
...with more than a few bread crumbs attesting to its electronic forgery.
Bottom line, Obama's Birth Certificate, the one you can download yourself right off the White House Website is indeed a hoax. No scanner or post-processing software would (or even can) produce these artifacts from a single scan. The only way for these artifacts to have been created are by scanning multiple elements in at different resolutions, and with the color space of some elements having been significantly compressed (2 or 4-color), and in different color spaces at that, with other elements having far greater range of colors. That's a fancy way of saying "It was faked using layering technology of Adobe Photoshop or a similar graphics manipulation program."
So - someone knew Photoshop (or similar) well enough to use it's layering capabilities, but not enough to hide the trail of breadcrumbs. My question is: "Was the trail of breadcrumbs the work of a novice, or did the graphic artist have enough integrity to leave the trail on purpose in the hopes the lid on this fraud would one day be blown wide open?"
What does this mean/prove? All it proves, really, is that someone, somewhere, manufactured his long form and knowingly passed it off as the original, and that it sits on the White House website for everyone to download and verify for themselves. Who dunnit? It was either the White House, the hospital in Hawaii, or someone they contracted to do so. I seriously doubt it was the work of a third party, as either the White House or the Hospital would have rejected it. Regardless, if that hospital authenticated it, they're either the originators, or they're complicit with the White House. It does not prove that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii. They did, after all, produce a "short form." That's easily faked, however, which is why everyone was clamoring for the long form. It does not prove Obama was born in Kenya, although there are many websites, including this one, which show one or more copies/versions of his Kenyan birth certificate. SNOPES says that's a hoax, but I ask you to keep two things in mind. First, SNOPES is owned and run by two extreme liberals. Second, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., is the one who is bringing the issue of the Kenyan birth certificate into the national spotlight, and her case is being heard TODAY by Judge Michael Malihi in an Alabama State Administrative Court. You can read Obama's disdainful response for yourselves.
This still leaves us with three questions:
1. "Why fake it at all?"
2. "Why commit such a high crime / misdemeanor?"
3. Does the degree of deception warrant a much further, deeper level of investigation, and if evidence is found which demands charges be levied, isn't it about time impeachment proceedings begin?