MyWifeSaidYes
Regular Member
Why don't policemen get along with firemen?
Because firemen have longer hoses.
http://www.policemanvsfireman.com/
Because firemen have longer hoses.
http://www.policemanvsfireman.com/
In a true SHTF situation? Hell no. He ain't gettin my car. Any other time? I dunno.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
13-417. Necessity defense
A. Conduct that would otherwise constitute an offense is justified if a reasonable person was compelled to engage in the proscribed conduct and the person had no reasonable alternative to avoid imminent public or private injury greater than the injury that might reasonably result from the person's own conduct.
B. An accused person may not assert the defense under subsection A if the person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly placed himself in the situation in which it was probable that the person would have to engage in the proscribed conduct.
C. An accused person may not assert the defense under subsection A for offenses involving homicide or serious physical injury.
13-402. Justification; execution of public duty
A. Unless inconsistent with the other sections of this chapter defining justifiable use of physical force or deadly physical force or with some other superseding provision of law, conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable when it is required or authorized by law.
B. The justification afforded by subsection A also applies if:
1. A reasonable person would believe such conduct is required or authorized by the judgment or direction of a competent court or tribunal or in the lawful execution of legal process, notwithstanding lack of jurisdiction of the court or defect in the legal process; or
2. A reasonable person would believe such conduct is required or authorized to assist a peace officer in the performance of such officer's duties, notwithstanding that the officer exceeded the officer's legal authority.
13-3802. Right to command aid for execution of process; punishment for resisting process
A. When a sheriff or other public officer authorized to execute process finds, or has reason to believe that resistance will be made to execution of the process, such officer may command as many inhabitants of the county as the officer deems proper to assist in overcoming such resistance.
B. The officer shall certify to the court from which the process issued the names of those persons resisting, and they may be proceeded against for contempt of court.
3-3802. Right to command aid for execution of process; punishment for resisting process
A. When a sheriff or other public officer authorized to execute process finds, or has reason to believe that resistance will be made to execution of the process, such officer may command as many inhabitants of the county as the officer deems proper to assist in overcoming such resistance.
B. The officer shall certify to the court from which the process issued the names of those persons resisting, and they may be proceeded against for contempt of court.
If I was the pool owner I would have been perfectly happy after they fixed the gate.
And all of the expensive filtering equipment after it ran dry (given that it was automatic and/or on at the time it ran dry).
Can you say no? certainly. But how would you know the cop wants it because you are prepared? Odds are the cop has family. Odds are the cop is already prepared in some fashion.Now, if we were to have a situation where mass outages, and or natural disaster…
What would you do, if you are bug’n out, and a cop (and you can probably tell), want to commandeer your vehicle and stuff because you are prepared and he/she is not.
Can you say “no”?
I would ask them why. "Why do you need MINE and not someone elses?" is another good question.Could you treat the cop like you would as a “robber/ looter”?
He calmed down? Wow. Tell you what, in that particular scenario TW, all I would be concerned about is "is my neighbor ok?" and "is my home ok?". Pool water can be replaced. The grass can be regrown. You can't do that with a human life.I ran mutual aid to a call in a rural area with no supply (hydrant), tanker was minutes out.... 1000 gallon reserve tank on the engine was gone in a heartbeat..... The house was fully involved...... Neighbor had a pool, knocked on the door, no one answered....
We kicked down the gate, dropped a supply line into the pool, and prevented dwelling extension until tanker showed up, where we quickly extinguished the blaze.
The county DID pay for all the damages to the gate, refilled the pool, and even sodded the grass.... The guy was NOT happy, as I understood it, he was on vacation at the time.
His siding was melted (vinyl), and part of his roof was singed....... We explained to him that had we NOT dropped a line in his pool, and waited the few minutes for the tanker to arrive, his house would've been consumed as well... After that, he seemed to calm down a bit.....
I never dealt with the legal aspect, I was just a hose dragger. I let officers handle that crap.
Let us look at some options.
1. The Individual who is attempting to take your vehicle is in a uniform(LEO).
2. The individual attempting to take your vehicle is in plain clothes (LEO or any other fool).
Would I allow #1 to take my vehicle? No. I do not give a rats azz what you are wearing, it is carjacking and you may very well get shot.
Would I allow #2 to take my vehicle? No. See above.
Know how police officers and firefighters are alike?
They all want to be firefighters.
Oh, but it is on topic, Grape! You see, firefighters open carry most of the time when on a call.
Well, ok. So what if it's a fire hose. Or an ax. Or a fire extinguisher. But come on! They're still carrying those "weapons"/tools in the open!
(havn't you ever learned how to use a fire extinguisher or fire hose as a weapon?)
Is this thread, and by extension Logan 5's posts, not in "The Lounge"....."The Social Lounge?"(8) KEEP IT ON-TOPIC: All gun rights discussions not directly related to open carry should take place in the "General Discussions" forum and topics that are not related to gun rights at all should take place in "The Lounge". Please police your own posts before posting them and help keep OCDO strong and focused.
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules
Clarification is requested for the benefit of all members.(8) KEEP IT ON-TOPIC: All gun rights discussions not directly related to open carry should take place in the "General Discussions" forum and topics that are not related to gun rights at all should take place in "The Lounge". Please police your own posts before posting them and help keep OCDO strong and focused.
Neither OC or RKBA related - moved it....
(8) KEEP IT ON-TOPIC: All gun rights discussions not directly related to open carry should take place in the "General Discussions" forum and topics that are not related to gun rights at all should take place in "The Lounge". Please police your own posts before posting them and help keep OCDO strong and focused.
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules
Yes, I did read that in his post of Yesterday, 06:24 AM, Post #35. Yet Grapeshot reiterates Forum Rule (8) again today, at 02:38 AM, in Post #37, after this thread was moved to The Social Lounge.He said he already moved it.