How totally absurd! How completely banal! Does that judge think the Bill of Rights only applies to one's home? Are you kidding me?
Freedom of religion, but only inside your house?
Freedom of the press, but only while you're in your domicile?
Freedom of speech, but only if inside your dwelling?
Freedom of peacable assembly, but only if you assemble in your own houses?
What manner of logic served this judge in reaching such a ridiculous opinion?
Talk about nonsense! That's the worst decision from a judge since Citizens United!