Phoenix David
Regular Member
So the Personnel Reliability Program was good enough for special weapons but not small arms? Either we are equal or we are not.
And how many know what that's for? :lol:
So the Personnel Reliability Program was good enough for special weapons but not small arms? Either we are equal or we are not.
Small Arms Instructor/Range Master in my Navy days, a high percentage of folks who got 'qualified' while in, should not be allowed to carry, let alone own, after they got out.
I have never known a 1st Sergeant to be anything other than a person (although some may have had questionable humanity).
And how many know what that's for? :lol:
How is this even a question? "Should we arm our military?" Is this la-la-land or what? Who really thinks that members of our own military should not be able carry virtually anywhere? Hell, cops have more rights in that regard.
I am one of those. I believe we could be faced with unintended consequences when removing the restrictions for Obama's standing army to be armed, in uniform, off base. Off duty, out of uniform carrying a personal weapon I certainly wouldn't have a problem with.
The "standing army" is the Federal agencies and local police forces IMO, not the US Military.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENTThere are roughly one million armed federal agents apart, even, from the militarys.
I understand where you're coming from. Of course I want our servicemen to be safe and some changes may be prudent. I just think we should be cautious about the powers of the US military and it's commander in chief outside of war time.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Investigative Authority and Personnel at 13 Agencies
http://www.gao.gov/assets/230/223212.pdf
Pay particular attention to page 12 - IRS and page 13 - ATF.
Also,
USE OF FORCE
ATF Policy, Training and Review Process Are Comparable to DEA’s and FBI’s
http://www.gaonet.gov/assets/160/155422.pdf
See page 123 - ATF - Waco Operation.
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 44 - FIREARMS
Sec. 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities
You will NOT carry a gun, you will NOT defend yourself on base, you will NOT carry a gun to and from work or any stops during the work day. If you're out on lunch off base and you and your comrades are targets because of your uniform - TOUGH LUCK. The government would rather see your child grow up with out a father than have you carry a gun to and from work for lawful self defense off base. PERIOD This will NEVER change.
You can carry a gun to kill people to defend your government's interests, but you better not carry a gun while driving home so your family can have a daddy growing up.
1) The term "Federal facility" means a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties.
Your point?That report is a bit outdated as we now have the umbrella called Department of Homeland Security, which includes several agencies under one central leadership.
Therein lies part of the problem, how can one trust a CIC who has no military service record?
How many of our elected officials even have military service records?
It's a shame that our family members who are serving are not able to defend themselves unless they're in their own home or in an active combat zone.
we ARE in a war. The White Bronco War.
I'm apparently dumber than a bag of rocks. What is that supposed to mean?
stay safe.
what? not old enough to remember the low-speed chase of O.J. Simpson? We're just slowly following ISIS around, waiting for something bad to happen so we can react. Always too little too late. Ram those bastards into the guardrail and take them out!