Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Shooting Range bill from a Democrat

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    , ,

    Shooting Range bill from a Democrat

  2. #2
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    He wants to use $1.7 Million.

    If Congress simply prevented the National Forest Service from closing off land, the National Park Service from annexing land, the Bureau of Land Management from including "no shooting" as a ridiculous, do-nothing rule, and whatever green Nazis enacted all the uber-protected land crap, the cost would be $0.00.

    Actually, it would probably make a profit, as it costs money for all those agencies to sit around thinking up and implementing their do-nothing rules.
    I no longer have any confidence in the moderation or administration of this forum. Nonetheless, the First STILL protects the Second, and the Second protects the First! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents. If you're going to do anything at all, do it right!

  3. #3
    Regular Member Gunslinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Free, Colorado, USA
    Udall is pro gun. He has many faults, but that isn't one of them.
    "For any man who sheds his blood with me this day shall be my brother...And gentlemen now abed shall think themselves accursed, they were not here, and hold their manhoods cheap whilst any speaks who fought with us on Crispin's day." Henry V

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts