-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Shooting Range bill from a Democrat
- Thread starter mahkagari
- Start date
since9
Campaign Veteran
He wants to use $1.7 Million.
If Congress simply prevented the National Forest Service from closing off land, the National Park Service from annexing land, the Bureau of Land Management from including "no shooting" as a ridiculous, do-nothing rule, and whatever green Nazis enacted all the uber-protected land crap, the cost would be $0.00.
Actually, it would probably make a profit, as it costs money for all those agencies to sit around thinking up and implementing their do-nothing rules.
Gunslinger
Regular Member
Udall is pro gun. He has many faults, but that isn't one of them.