There's already a thread, in general discussion:
Warning, if you have a heart condition, sit down and be prepared to call for help before reading. It's rather short.
"But in our country, not only do criminals have all the guns they want*, but so do the law-abiding citizens.
There is only one explanation for these facts: It is the law-abiding citizens with guns, not the criminals, who are committing the majority of the gun homicides."
I've heard them beat around the bush for quite a while, but this is the first time I have seen it written flat out like this, shameful. They use the same nit picking of facts I usually see. What they purposefully leave out is that while England has very few gun-releated homicides, knife wielding thugs are at an all time high. The article is full of so many flaws in logic that it boggles the mind. So how can law-abiding citizens commit homicide and still be law-abiding and not a criminal?
"Over 50% of U.S. gun homicides are due to arguments not criminals." So, people who commit homicide are not criminals? And who is an argument? I've never heard of this type of person that apparently is not a criminal. What a way to twist the facts. I like how the writer is NGAC..... so no single person can have a face to associate with the words. And they can always claim it was someone who's "no longer with us" that wrote such a blatantly false article to cover their arse. I know this is just par for the course for these people, and that many of you have seen this sort of thing many times before, (I am relatively new to the political side of the guns issues) but I just can't wrap my head around it.
"A Right Un-exercised is a Right Lost"
"According to the law, [openly carrying] in a vehicle is against the law if the weapon is concealed" -Flamethrower (think about it....)
Carrying an XDm 9mm with Hornady Critical Defense hollowpoint. Soon to be carrying a Ruger along with it....