I've read the actual TEXT of the law here in FL RE: OC.
Is there any established 'precedent' RE: printing even though the sidearm is not directly visible?
“Concealed firearm” means any firearm, as defined in subsection (6), which is carried on or about a person in such a manner as to conceal the firearm from the ordinary sight of another person.
The critical question turns on whether an individual, standing near a person with a firearm or beside a vehicle in which a person with a firearm is seated, may by ordinary observation know the questioned object to be a firearm.
The critical question turns on whether an individual, standing near a person with a firearm or beside a vehicle in which a person with a firearm is seated, may by ordinary observation know the questioned object to be a firearm.
ah, so i'm not a liar..... How long did that take to find? Did i not say it was case law?
I am not the fact welfare. You berated me publicly claiming that this does not exist and that i'm a loony for suggesting it, and here you are citing it yourself...........
Ah, so I'm not a liar..... How long did that take to find? Did I not say it was case law?
I am not the fact welfare. You berated me publicly claiming that this does not exist and that I'm a loony for suggesting it, and here you are citing it yourself...........
Couldn't printing be classified as improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms as exhibiting in a "careless" manner?
790.10 Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms.--If any person having or carrying any dirk, sword, sword cane, firearm, electric weapon or device, or other weapon shall, in the presence of one or more persons, exhibit the same in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner, not in necessary self-defense, the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.