http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/08/14/state/n104706D01.DTL&tsp=1
There are obvious parallels here. If owners of private property cannot restrict people's fundamental right to freely speak, then surely they cannot restrict people's fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
There are obvious parallels here. If owners of private property cannot restrict people's fundamental right to freely speak, then surely they cannot restrict people's fundamental right to keep and bear arms.