woodyrr
Regular Member
I was a member of an organization - I say I was a member because I had to withdraw my support and promotion because of their decision to post against open carry.
It appears that someone called and told them they were going to visit and carry openly on the grounds. The result was the powers that be panicked and took the easiest course they could which was to post. I have had the policy of refusing to patronize posted establishments unless there is absolutely no alternative since the Oklahoma SDA law was passed some fourteen years ago and I cannot give a pass to this one organization just because I approve of their mission. We, the CHL holders on here, and others have worked wonders to whittle the number of posted establishments down tremendously over the years. With the passage of open carry, I am very pleased to see that except in a very few instances, we are not having to do it again.
I am wondering if it is a good idea to be calling places and putting them in a tight spot about their carry policy. I think it causes a lot of bad snap decisions. What do you think?
It appears that someone called and told them they were going to visit and carry openly on the grounds. The result was the powers that be panicked and took the easiest course they could which was to post. I have had the policy of refusing to patronize posted establishments unless there is absolutely no alternative since the Oklahoma SDA law was passed some fourteen years ago and I cannot give a pass to this one organization just because I approve of their mission. We, the CHL holders on here, and others have worked wonders to whittle the number of posted establishments down tremendously over the years. With the passage of open carry, I am very pleased to see that except in a very few instances, we are not having to do it again.
I am wondering if it is a good idea to be calling places and putting them in a tight spot about their carry policy. I think it causes a lot of bad snap decisions. What do you think?