The right to travel has been recognized by the supreme court. The right to operate a car has not been determined to be a right. There are many other ways to travel besides operating your own motor vehicle. Operating a motor vehicle is a privilege granted by the state and therefore has nothing to do with the Constitution (which is for the most part restrictions on federal government, not state government). Skolnik in this case has shown disregard for the state's laws and put the public in danger by driving a possibly dangerous vehicle. Also, with lack of insurance he has put the public in more danger because if the happens to get into an accident there is no viable solution to pay for the damages he causes.
The "right" to drive in other states is not enjoyed because of any federal law either, but rather by reciprocal agreement amongst the states.
Skolnik is a classic example of why people in glass houses shouldn't....(fill in the blank).
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy! :lol: