Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
I thought this was an interesting line in the article: "Asked last week about the administration’s positions on these matters, Mr. Obama’s press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said the White House was focused on “the important healing process.” That is part of the president’s duties. So is protecting public safety."
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/opinion/23sun1.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print
So, the President (D) is focusing on the healing process and not gun-restriction. And this whole time I was under the impression by some in the media, that President Obama was out to take our firearms away. You would think this gun-hating Democrat would be capitalizing on this tragic event, but all indicators are that he is interested in discussing current political discourse, not firearm confiscation.
There are some fun little lines in this article about how we would be "safer" if this that and the other were to occur--hey, it's the NY Times, what do you expect!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/opinion/23sun1.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print
So, the President (D) is focusing on the healing process and not gun-restriction. And this whole time I was under the impression by some in the media, that President Obama was out to take our firearms away. You would think this gun-hating Democrat would be capitalizing on this tragic event, but all indicators are that he is interested in discussing current political discourse, not firearm confiscation.
There are some fun little lines in this article about how we would be "safer" if this that and the other were to occur--hey, it's the NY Times, what do you expect!