How many persons were injured? How many shots fired?
Were guns pointed "at" officers?
If they were, are these private citizen providing cover to their fellows any less "peaceful" than were the police sharpshooters providing cover to their fellow officers at the same time?
Are you willing to say that police sharpshooters on the scene were anything other than peaceful based on the fact that they may have had a private citizen in their scope at some point?
Again, more hypocrisy typical of Progs.
Is there sufficient evidence to actually convict anyone at the southern Nevada Bundy protests of threatening police officers with guns? Has anyone been convicted of that crime yet? Do you believe in "Innocent until proven guilty"? Or only for long-haired, pot smoking, welfare Progs sucking on the hind tit of society?
Far more have been convicted of assault with the "unarmed" OWS protests than have been convicted of assault at the Bundy protests.
More importantly, there are FAR more victims with real harm done (whether anyone is every convicted or not) at the OWS trespassing events than in the southern Nevada Bundy protests. So far as I'm aware,
not a single person was injured from any sort of criminal conduct at the southern Nevada Bundy protests.
You are engaging in typical Prog circular logic: Having guns is bad so we must impose criminal penalties. Since criminal charges have been brought, it is obvious that having guns is bad.
Congrats. This has all the intellectual honesty of the radical right wing religious nuts who said the same thing about homosexual conduct for decades. Sodomy is bad so it must be criminalized. The fact that sodomy is criminalized is evidence that it is bad.
Give it up. The facts are clear.
NOBODY injured by criminal conduct at the armed (oh, scary guns) southern Nevada Bundy protest.
Rapes, other sexual assaults, theft, physical assaults, illegal drug use, and drug over doses at the (allegedly) "unarmed" OWS protest.
Charles