Freedom1Man
Regular Member
I support what you did for the most part.
The demanding a refund for all purchases was a bit much IMO but that is all it is my opinion.
I am glad that you went to the HQ with your complaint.
__________-
Side topic.
Since corporations exist only with the permission of the state, then the following would not be a property right violation.
Any corporation that prohibits real people from being able to carry the tools used in self defense, should be liable for the safety of the * cough cough* employees while on the clock and traveling to and from the job, and must provide lock boxes for visitors/customers while the aforementioned is visiting plus be liable for any loss/damage of/to the tools while being held.
This would not apply to non-incorporated businesses.
The demanding a refund for all purchases was a bit much IMO but that is all it is my opinion.
I am glad that you went to the HQ with your complaint.
__________-
Side topic.
Since corporations exist only with the permission of the state, then the following would not be a property right violation.
Any corporation that prohibits real people from being able to carry the tools used in self defense, should be liable for the safety of the * cough cough* employees while on the clock and traveling to and from the job, and must provide lock boxes for visitors/customers while the aforementioned is visiting plus be liable for any loss/damage of/to the tools while being held.
This would not apply to non-incorporated businesses.