safcrkr
Regular Member
According to the link that you supplied in post #4 of this thread, the background check is what is scrambling the sequence of applications received versus applications issued. From Post #368: So if your name is "Slobadynicki Balihoonian", you will probably be processed a lot faster than, say, "John Smith". It's nobody's fault and not a grand scheme, it's just that it takes longer to check out some names than others, especially if the states you have to cross-check with are slow to respond.
Never said anything about it being an intentional "scheme" from the beginning. Incompetance, nonchalantness on order received, disorganization... yes, possibilities. If everyone waiting on a "delayed" background check had the name "John Smith", then that'd explain the long wait for them. And if everyone who has mailed in days after others and has gotten issued has the name "Slobadynicki Balihoonian", then there's no questions as to the holdup for the John Smiths. If your name is common like John Smith, then you probably get delayed every time you go through the system, so you can expect it here too. But if you have an uncommon name, never got delayed before but are still waiting, what's your explanation for that? Those are the people I'm talking about. It again goes back to their stated policy of "processing in order received". If they're not, then they should just say they're not. "We tried, but it didn't work". That's all they'd have to say. Otherwise they're misleading people into thinking of what the problem could be in the delay? Lost, etc?
Just for kicks, I did a "google" on a buddy who mailed on the 1st, got issued on the 9th. There's 63 people with his exact same first & last name just in Wisconsin, 7 have same middle, and over 700 in the U.S.A. with same first & last. I mailed on the 1st, there's 3 in Wisconsin with my first/last name, 23 in the entire U.S.A. , and only one with same middle. So that explanation of "same name delays" won't fly for everybody (some yes, no argument), so what's the delay for the "Slobadynicki Balihoonians" ? I'm not claiming it's intentional, conspiracy, grand scheme... none of that tinfoil hat crap. The only other explanation is disorganization or incompetance on the part of DOJ's processing system. And I am baffled as to why you, and some DOJ "apologists", refuse to admit they've got it all screwed up when it's right there under your nose <sigh>.
(I used my buddy & I as my examples simply because I could... I know the particulars.... full names, even DOBs. I can't research everybody because I don't know their names. I used what I could, but I think it's a good enough sampling).
btw... that link I supplied in post 4, to post 368 on that other forum, was to an explanation from a DOJ employee as to what the holdup is on issuing permits. Did you expect him to say "we screwed the pooch"?
Last edited: