I Have Spent Considerable Time In Contemplation On This
First off I'd like to address this thorough fabrication:
On Monday, motorists can expect to see a minimum of two security officers posted on each side of the James River to screen those traveling the ferry. The officers will continue to randomly screen vehicles. Selected vehicles may notice increased screening measures to include checking vehicle trunks, undercarriages, engine compartments and enclosed containers. Security officers may also check the cargo areas of cars, trucks, campers and trailers.
Many here are (or should be) aware of my personal encounter with the VDOT Gestapo at Scotland Wharf this past... June, was it? My vehicle was chosen for random screening and when I asked what that entailed they explained that the
SCREEN was
NOT a search. They said they
COULD NOT open any areas of my vehicle and look inside.
One of the other members here (God bless him, but I cannot recall which one) was in his truck right behind me when one operative told me to open my tailgate - and he hollered "Don't open that for them!" As I opened it the second operative on the "screening" team said it wasn't necessary. This inconsistency was just one of the things I addressed in my letters to McDonnell, Cuccinelli and Connaughton (Sec. of Transportation) when I returned after that fiasco.
I explained that I was conceding to their "random" screening only under duress and coercion and that I do not consent to searches, which they repeatedly assured me their "screening" was not. At the moment they demanded I open my tailgate, it became a search, plain and simple.
Now, on to Skidmark.
I have been following this thread with some interest and reading about the growing contingent of support for this gentleman. I will be the first to acknowledge that our (mine and his) relationship in this community started out somewhat adversarial. It was quite apparent that we are equally passionate about our 2nd Amendment rights, though have somewhat different opinions about the means to our ends.
At any rate, when we sat down to lunch that afternoon at the Surrey House amongst other Virginia
PATRIOTS for fellowship and camaraderie there was no animosity and no pretension. At any rate, after the meal and before our departure he made sure to let me know that I was not anything like what he had expected - and neither he to I - and that was probably a good thing for both of us!
When any one of our brothers-in-arms is in need I am generally appalled at the circumstances of their predicament and then equally proud to count this community among my friends when the outpouring of support comes so fully and freely. My wife and I are not in much of a position to be sending donations of great amount, but I can make a small offering in his support.
God bless.