This.
You can see the process here as well as the form letters:
http://www.ct.gov/bfpe/cwp/view.asp?a=1252&Q=254192&bfpeNav=
Hi Rich,
I really don't like their "form letters" myself. But I guess....the board will take them. Most information is being sought by their "evil" (lol) questionnaire.
I don't know how the OP wants to play the game .. but I objected (filed and objection, actually 2 sets of (about 10 pages of pleadings with each set of objections and some exhibits) to ALL of the questionnaire's questions and the board agreed that only these needed to be completed:
Name, Address, Other address, Attorney representation query, Date of Birth, US citizen
question, Date applied,
Name of police or 1st selectman to whom I gave application to, Name of police or selectman who
denied, State the reason for denial, What date was the denial, How did you learn of the denial
All other line questions were ruled not mandatory to answer. I still think the citizen query, names of who I dealt with, reason for denial, and how I learned of it are still bogus. But I preserved these objections for appeal..if desired.
So the OP could submit his questionnaire in with objections to all, like me, or just of the other sections that were struck down as being mandatory.
It won't matter time-wise .. the appeal will take just as long either way.
Now the issuing authority filed a questionnaire too (the board sends them one (its a different questionnaire) after they docket your case I guess), in about 2 months (was my time for getting it). And I objected to this questionnaire as well for several reasons.
So before the OP files, he needs to decide on his trial strategy. One can object and be civil about it and I have not had issues in administrative hearings that they go south because of it but to preserve issues for a possible rejection, objection rulings are reviewable. Since most of my objections were on the basis of the law being interpreted, these would be de novo reviews - well worth keeping alive IMO.
Others don't want the hassle and just go with the flow. That's fine. All depends on the person.
The last page of the questionnaire was very concerning - what if you forgot some stupid traffic ticket? They could then claim you lied on the questionnaire and deny you because of that -- you'll note that this page (MV/arrest record) is not mandatory.