Juror speaks out

eye95 · Jul 15, 2013

Just heard an interview from CNN on WDTN.

Juror says race was not a concern of Z. Also says jury believed that Z feared for his life and was defending himself.

davidmcbeth · Jul 16, 2013

who else is tried of Zimmerman threads? Moving on

PFC HALE · Jul 16, 2013

who else is tired of hearing how angelic and "young" a punk a$$ thug almost a legal adult at 17 standing 6'2" wearing a hoodie sweater in summer evening heat and humidity walking around in the dark high on weed and then attacking another person

he got shot for attacking another person. its called self defense.

moving on.

eye95 · Jul 16, 2013

The point of this thread (which went flying over the heads of some) is that the juror is saying that the jury did not simply find Z "not guilty." That only means that the State failed to prove its case. The juror is essentially saying that Z is innocent, a verdict unavailable to the jury that means Z proved not only his lack of guilt, but the truth of his story and his utter innocence of the crimes with which he was charged.

The pundits keep saying that Z is free because the State failed to prove its case. Bravo Sierra.

FreeInAZ · Jul 17, 2013

eye95 said:
The point of this thread (which went flying over the heads of some) is that the juror is saying that the jury did not simply find Z "not guilty." That only means that the State failed to prove its case. The juror is essentially saying that Z is innocent, a verdict unavailable to the jury that means Z proved not only his lack of guilt, but the truth of his story and his utter innocence of the crimes with which he was charged.

The pundits keep saying that Z is free because the State failed to prove its case. Bravo Sierra.

+1 Agreed Bull $hit. ( For the non military folks).

WalkingWolf · Jul 17, 2013

Not only did the Juror confirm, Rachel Jeantel did as well, telling how TM only was giving GZ a a$$ whuppin. Kiss that federal prosecution goodbye, kiss the civil suit goodbye. The parents will be lucky if GZ does not sue them for the actions of their minor son and take every single dime.

I want to know if the prosecution knew before the trial from RJ that indeed TM was the aggressor.

davidmcbeth · Jul 18, 2013

eye95 said:
Just heard an interview from CNN on WDTN.

Juror says race was not a concern of Z. Also says jury believed that Z feared for his life and was defending himself.

You know that other jurors have come out and discounted most of what the juror who initially wanted to write a book stated.

Taking talking points from CNN? You should know better. Or you do now.

davidmcbeth · Jul 18, 2013

WalkingWolf said:
The parents will be lucky if GZ does not sue them for the actions of their minor son and take every single dime.

.

An angle I did not think about .... good post.

WalkingWolf · Jul 18, 2013

davidmcbeth said:
You know that other jurors have come out and discounted most of what the juror who initially wanted to write a book stated.

Taking talking points from CNN? You should know better. Or you do now.

Not really they said that both were responsible but Zimmerman did not break the law. Which is what juror B37 said. I believe they were just miffed that she spoke out.

Juror speaks out

eye95

Well-known member

davidmcbeth

Banned

PFC HALE

Regular Member

eye95

Well-known member

FreeInAZ

Regular Member

WalkingWolf

Regular Member

davidmcbeth

Banned

davidmcbeth

Banned

WalkingWolf

Regular Member