Citizen
Founder's Club Member
My guess is no. Concealed means concealed, Don't ask Don't tell, Carry always, Tell no one, etc.
Kinda like some "educated" people conceal their common-sense?
My guess is no. Concealed means concealed, Don't ask Don't tell, Carry always, Tell no one, etc.
Kinda like some "educated" people conceal their common-sense?
maybe those "educated" people lack the common-sense to conceal.
Seriously, how many active shooters have to hit college campuses until they realize their policies aren't doing jack to stop them? Let me reference my signature below again:
Biting tongue so as to not make the response this demands. :lol:
Well, there is a first time for everything.
But, wouldn't you really just sit on your hands or something to restrain from typing, as opposed to biting your tonuge? What? Do you type with your tongue? Eeww!
In my opinion, the University has, by prohibiting self-defense, undertaken an affirmative obligation to defend the students. Anyone who is assaulted has a cause of action against the University. The standard rule that one has the duty to protect himself, and that the police and the state have no obligation to do so goes out the window when the state acts asparens patriae and prohibits self-defense.
In my opinion, the University has, by prohibiting self-defense, undertaken an affirmative obligation to defend the students. Anyone who is assaulted has a cause of action against the University. The standard rule that one has the duty to protect himself, and that the police and the state have no obligation to do so goes out the window when the state acts asparens patriae and prohibits self-defense.
Read: anyone who defends themselves will be summarily punished for effecting such defense.A student who is assaulted and retaliates by hitting, kicking, or any other physical means, may be disciplined for fighting. [S. B. Reg. 5-36.1; 5-36.3; 5-37.1/Rule 14] "
Have they prohibited self-defense or only prohibiting more effective means of self-defense? A student who is assaulted and retaliates by hitting, kicking, or any other physical means, may be disciplined for fighting. [S. B. Reg. 5-36.1; 5-36.3; 5-37.1/Rule 14] "
Have they prohibited self-defense or only prohibiting more effective means of self-defense?...
As to the school regulation, I'm thinking two things: first, the key word is "retaliation", not "defense". Use of the word, "retaliation", suggests that the assault and/or battery is over and done with, and the victim chooses to renew the attack in the opposite direction. I don't have a problem with that rule.
Read: anyone who defends themselves will be summarily punished for effecting such defense.
:banghead: