Under NO circumstances? Are you saying that you would physically resist any attempt by a Law Enforcement Officer to remove your firearm?
Or are you saying that you would never, under any circumstance, hand your firearm to a requesting/demanding LEO, instead requiring the LEO to disarm you?
Just looking to gain clarification of your statement.
I cannot think of a reason, if I am not in violation of any law, that LE would ever disarm me. I would like to cite Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893)* in regards to defending oneself using force against an illegal arrest (although your right to do so varies from state to state). I would also like to cite the court case Terry vs. Ohio** in regards to the police needing "specific and articulable facts" to backup a "resonable suspicion" that a crime is going to be committed. If I am open carrying and have not broken any laws it is my opinion therefore that I may not be detained or disarmed. As far as resisting, unfortunately in VA as I understand it, I have no right no resist with force unless I fear for my life or if excessive force is used. As far as willingly handing over my pistol, or willing allowing LEO to disarm me for no reason whatsoever, there's absolutely no way I am going to allow an illegal seizure, and I am willing to "take the ride" if that's what I have to do to stand up for my rights, and a law suit against the department that arrested me would surely follow. If I were in a state that allowed physical or forceful resistance to unlawful arrest or seizure, I would defend myself to the extent to which I am permitted.
This is my favorite link to post in regards to unlawful arrest or seizure... http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plummer_v._State
**http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio
Please correct me if I am wrong about any of these items.