Gundude
Regular Member
I am trying to understand the Heller decision.
The court interpreted the 2a regarding the milita correctly.
The interpreted the "right to keep and bear" correctly.
They bailed out on the "shall not be infringed" part.
Was this a compromise to get a 5-4 decesion.
This has opened the door for the Calif legislature to endlessly decide how to infringe and there will be endless cases deciding on how much they can infringe.
I have this picture in my mind of Alan Gura before the court, a wrinkled old man, wearing Depends.
The court interpreted the 2a regarding the milita correctly.
The interpreted the "right to keep and bear" correctly.
They bailed out on the "shall not be infringed" part.
Was this a compromise to get a 5-4 decesion.
This has opened the door for the Calif legislature to endlessly decide how to infringe and there will be endless cases deciding on how much they can infringe.
I have this picture in my mind of Alan Gura before the court, a wrinkled old man, wearing Depends.