• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

2012 Election Thread on Gun Rights

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
Hopefully we can use this thread to condense down our political discussions for this years elections.

First is on topic, Rob McKenna on gun rights

[video=youtube;KKkib10k6hI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKkib10k6hI&feature=youtu.be[/video]
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
I don't think he really meant the phrase "that responsible people" can own guns because this phrase puts the burden on the gun owner or wanna be owner.

And talking about cases already decided is not going on on a limb but I guess he is just highlighting his history.
If I had only 1min to talk, I would be talking about future issues beyond those of mental health issues (not on a limb there) but to the basics: assault weapons bans being wrong for one. This question is a good one to gauge pro-gun view points...if one says no to these laws being unlawful then he is not really the pro-gun candidate as he thinks he is.
 

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
I don't think he really meant the phrase "that responsible people" can own guns because this phrase puts the burden on the gun owner or wanna be owner.

And talking about cases already decided is not going on on a limb but I guess he is just highlighting his history.
If I had only 1min to talk, I would be talking about future issues beyond those of mental health issues (not on a limb there) but to the basics: assault weapons bans being wrong for one. This question is a good one to gauge pro-gun view points...if one says no to these laws being unlawful then he is not really the pro-gun candidate as he thinks he is.

Commenting from CT shows how out of touch you are with WA, your points are off base.

Listen to the definition of 'responsible people' and what Rob defines is non-felons and those with out voluntary mental adjudication. Which is what Washington law confirms. It is a simple minimum and fairly liberal standard applied to Washington's Constitution.

We have no assault weapons ban in Washington so your point is again baseless and shows that you should refrain from adding comments that you are ignorant of as an observer from 3000 miles away.

Ugh :banghead:
 

hermannr

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,327
Location
Okanogan Highland
What I have seen of McKenna would make me think he is a bit too mainstream Republician for my tastes, but I have not see anything (so far) that would make me think he is an anti.

If I had 1 minute with him, I would first ask about a repeal (or at least modification of) .270 or at least .270(1) and .050(2), correcting the legal age to carry to 18, recognizing all other states permits/licenses...that would be the start. Or basically, If it originated in 1994, it be repealed..get rid of the last vestages of Lowry and his gang.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Commenting from CT shows how out of touch you are with WA, your points are off base.

Listen to the definition of 'responsible people' and what Rob defines is non-felons and those with out voluntary mental adjudication. Which is what Washington law confirms. It is a simple minimum and fairly liberal standard applied to Washington's Constitution.

We have no assault weapons ban in Washington so your point is again baseless and shows that you should refrain from adding comments that you are ignorant of as an observer from 3000 miles away.

Ugh :banghead:

Listen again...and he talked about federal cases he was involved with Heller, McDonald (I think one of these was 3000 miles away, right?).... so I am not so ignorant, am I. Why not get involved with other federal cases involving assault weapons bans.

And talking about felons and crazy people? Wow, really going out on a limb there ...

Anyone can file an intervenor brief or "friend of the court" or otherwise enter a supporting brief if allowed by a federal judge.
 
Last edited:

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
What I have seen of McKenna would make me think he is a bit too mainstream Republician for my tastes, but I have not see anything (so far) that would make me think he is an anti.

If I had 1 minute with him, I would first ask about a repeal (or at least modification of) .270 or at least .270(1) and .050(2), correcting the legal age to carry to 18, recognizing all other states permits/licenses...that would be the start. Or basically, If it originated in 1994, it be repealed..get rid of the last vestages of Lowry and his gang.

I have spoken to him. If the house/senate was of the correct make-up then it would be possible and he would favor.

He is very mainstream, but hey we haven't had a R governor in 30 years in this state.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
What I have seen of McKenna would make me think he is a bit too mainstream Republician for my tastes, but I have not see anything (so far) that would make me think he is an anti.

If I had 1 minute with him, I would first ask about a repeal (or at least modification of) .270 or at least .270(1) and .050(2), correcting the legal age to carry to 18, recognizing all other states permits/licenses...that would be the start. Or basically, If it originated in 1994, it be repealed..get rid of the last vestages of Lowry and his gang.

RCW 26.04.050
Who may solemnize.


*** CHANGE IN 2012 *** (SEE 6239-S.SL) ***

The following named officers and persons, active or retired, are hereby authorized to solemnize marriages, to wit: Justices of the supreme court, judges of the court of appeals, judges of the superior courts, supreme court commissioners, court of appeals commissioners, superior court commissioners, any regularly licensed or ordained minister or any priest of any church or religious denomination, and judges of courts of limited jurisdiction as defined in RCW 3.02.010.


????
 

Bookman

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,424
Location
Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States
RCW 26.04.050
Who may solemnize.


*** CHANGE IN 2012 *** (SEE 6239-S.SL) ***

The following named officers and persons, active or retired, are hereby authorized to solemnize marriages, to wit: Justices of the supreme court, judges of the court of appeals, judges of the superior courts, supreme court commissioners, court of appeals commissioners, superior court commissioners, any regularly licensed or ordained minister or any priest of any church or religious denomination, and judges of courts of limited jurisdiction as defined in RCW 3.02.010.


????

You are, once again, showing your ignorance of the laws of the state of WA. Try starting with RCW 9.41.270 and going from there.
 

slapmonkay

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
1,308
Location
Montana
He is just trolling to increase post count... Ignore him and continue on...

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ct
Posts: 773
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
He is pro gun with "limitations". Just my feeling. He isn't a rights person by any means though.

Hadian seems more pro gun and more pro rights, I like his stance on 9th and 10th amendments. I don't like his bringing his God into politics. Feel he is better than McKenna though.

Justice Sanders, is pro rights across the board and willing to stick his neck on the line to stand up for liberty he is definitely getting my vote.
 

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
5,264
Location
In My Coffee
Seattle here. I can't freaking stand McGinn. I haven't come across any alternative.

Can anyone link me up on some potential replacements?
 

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
He is pro gun with "limitations". Just my feeling. He isn't a rights person by any means though.

Hadian seems more pro gun and more pro rights, I like his stance on 9th and 10th amendments. I don't like his bringing his God into politics. Feel he is better than McKenna though.

Justice Sanders, is pro rights across the board and willing to stick his neck on the line to stand up for liberty he is definitely getting my vote.

Also not a fan of the grandiose overtones of religion in the Hadian campaign. Hadian says alot of the right things, however, he does so lacking any significant experience.

It has been a constant priority throughout Shahram’s life to be a servant leader in his community. His unique background includes experience as a pastor, police officer, teacher, coach, and small business owner. An advocate for personal responsibility, Shahram has brought together local organizations and individuals to meet needs within the community. Furthermore, he was a leader in the fight to get two new laws passed in Snohomish County to toughen lewd behavior laws and combat prostitution. In 2010, Hadian was a candidate for WA State Representative, garnering key endorsements and support within Snohomish County. Hadian currently travels around the nation speaking with his company, The TIL Project.

He was a police officer with Redmond for a short time. However, there is little to no information on what he did there. (Patrol officer only?) Nor is there any explanation as to his departure from Redmond. His campaign has not responded to inquiries. Perhaps he doesn't see himself as a major candidate since he won't answer the questions regarding Redmond.

Hadian has made no official statements regarding Article I Section 24 or the 2nd Amendment. He continues to paint his campaign with vague language and courageous leadership. Mostly referring to his religious viewpoints and not liberty per se.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
Also not a fan of the grandiose overtones of religion in the Hadian campaign. Hadian says alot of the right things, however, he does so lacking any significant experience.



He was a police officer with Redmond for a short time. However, there is little to no information on what he did there. (Patrol officer only?) Nor is there any explanation as to his departure from Redmond. His campaign has not responded to inquiries. Perhaps he doesn't see himself as a major candidate since he won't answer the questions regarding Redmond.

Hadian has made no official statements regarding Article I Section 24 or the 2nd Amendment. He continues to paint his campaign with vague language and courageous leadership. Mostly referring to his religious viewpoints and not liberty per se.

Thanks for the info. Sigh definitely not liberty minded either on some issues.

Looks like I'll have to write in a Constitutional minded person.

Crack down on lewd behavior? Give me a break. When will politicians learn it only gets worse the more you "crack down".

On the thought of "experience", I have no problem with lack of experience and think inexperienced politicians are a better representative. Than those who have learned to compromise and play the game.
 
Last edited:

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
Thanks for the info. Sigh definitely not liberty minded either on some issues.

Looks like I'll have to write in a Constitutional minded person.

Crack down on lewd behavior? Give me a break. When will politicians learn it only gets worse the more you "crack down".

On the thought of "experience", I have no problem with lack of experience and think inexperienced politicians are a better representative. Than those who have learned to compromise and play the game.

Neither do I. It is just one factor to consider. I definitely wouldn't elect a 18yo for Governor just because they were student body president and had good ideas. Neither did our founders.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
Neither do I. It is just one factor to consider. I definitely wouldn't elect a 18yo for Governor just because they were student body president and had good ideas. Neither did our founders.

Good point, it seems some of our 18 year olds have more common sense than many of these politicians. :lol:
 
Top