• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Arrested for trespass -- on a public street?

Repeater

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
2,498
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
With implications for Open Carry, I ask the following question:

In Richmond, do we or do we NOT have a constitutional right to record the cops?

They seem to think ... NOT:

Trespassing…on a public street
On Oct. 31, Ian Graham got dressed for work. Although he is a photographer and more likely to wear jeans on the job, he put on a coat and tie.

Later that evening he was wearing handcuffs.

...

Around 1 a.m., when the typical Halloween bash is at its scariest, he got a phone call from Preston Duncan, the publisher of RVA Magazine. The police were moving on the Occupy Richmond site. Let’s get over there and cover it, Duncan said..

In an account published at rvamag.com, Duncan wrote that while he and Graham were standing on the public sidewalk on the perimeter of the plaza, they were threatened with arrest by the police. They moved to the area designated for journalists. But the view from that corner was obscured.

Graham walked to the middle of a crosswalk to get a better angle. He was arrested for trespassing and handcuffed.

Graham was charged under Virginia Code § 18.2-119, a section called “Trespass after having been forbidden to do so.” It is a Class 1 misdemeanor punishable by up to 12 months in jail and a $2,500 fine.

Graham told me that he was supposed to have a hearing on Nov. 18; he and his lawyer, Patrick Anderson, expected the charges to be dropped. But the Richmond commonwealth’s attorney’s office for some reason is playing hardball, so Anderson got a continuance.

Anderson, who has been retained by the American Civil Liberties Union to represent Graham, said he couldn’t comment except to confirm that the matter is set for trial on Jan. 24. The Richmond commonwealth’s attorney’s office wasn’t talking either; they didn’t return my call by press time.

There's no Probable Cause here. There's no case. Yet, the Richmond commonwealth’s attorney is being a hard-A?

Unless this is resolved in Ian's favor, no one is safe in Richmond.
 

DJEEPER

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
407
Location
Yorktown, ,
"Sir, as a police officer, I hereby declare that you can no longer take a stroll around the park on the inside lane of the walkway. since you are there now, you are now under arrest. Papers, please, sieg heil."

sounds about like the direction we are headed...
 

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
The State could care less if it proves the case -
The "offender" will be spending time and money to defend himself -
The officer is going to have a stead dinner that night whether the case is dropped or prosecuted -
... mission accomplished.
 

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
There's no Probable Cause here. There's no case. Yet, the Richmond commonwealth’s attorney is being a hard-A?

Unless this is resolved in Ian's favor, no one is safe in Richmond.
Ah, but they have special authority to rid the city of Occupants.

Wait... what? They don't? Oh, well. So long as the public value clearing out the protesters more than they value civil rights, they'll get away with it anyway. And they'll get away with cracking down on anyone who tries to document what they do.

It's Contempt of Cop on an official, department-wide scale. Journalists who assert their rights might beat the charges, but they're going to be punished anyway.
 

TechnoWeenie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
2,084
Location
, ,
The State could care less if it proves the case -
The "offender" will be spending time and money to defend himself -
The officer is going to have a stead dinner that night whether the case is dropped or prosecuted -
... mission accomplished.

Reason why more people need to resist unlawful arrests with overwhelming force.
 
H

Herr Heckler Koch

Guest
Rights are not defended by trickling down the path of least resistance.

Vaclav Havel said:
You do not become a "dissident" just because you decide one day to take up this most unusual career. You are thrown into it by your personal sense of responsibility, combined with a complex set of external circumstances. You are cast out of the existing structures and placed in a position of conflict with them. It begins as an attempt to do your work well, and ends with being branded an enemy of society. (The Power of the Powerless)
 
Top