Ok, so this tangent gave me cause to reread the law and I did find something I hadn't noticed before...
California Penal Code Section 12026.1
(a) Section 12025 shall not be construed to prohibit any
citizen of the United States over the age of 18 years who resides or
is temporarily within this state, and who is not prohibited by state
or federal law from possessing, receiving, owning, or purchasing a
firearm, from transporting or carrying any pistol, revolver, or other
firearm capable of being concealed upon the person, provided that
the following applies to the firearm: (1) The firearm is within a motor vehicle and it is locked in the
vehicle's trunk or in a locked container in the vehicle other than
the utility or glove compartment.
(2) The firearm is carried by the person directly to or from any
motor vehicle for any lawful purpose and, while carrying the firearm,
the firearm is contained within a locked container.
12026.1 is a bit ambiguous. So yet, it uses the word "carry", not just transportation... making it sound like you can have a car gun that is propperly stowed in the trunk of your car, as in how someone might open carry or conceal carry their weapon. But, the portion in blue seems to say that BOTH (1) and (2) need to be accomplished... this makes me think that a "car gun" would vioate (2) and thereby violate this portion of the law. So, I take this to mean then that someone who is traveling to go camping, can stop and run some errands, therebye carrying the gun and not tranporting it and still be lawful as because the end goal is a place of lawful transportation. Of course, keeping a open carry type holster on your person could then make many places lawful to Vehicle Carry your gun because it creates a lawful purpose at your stop provided it is not in a GFZ. Hmmm... this is confusing indeed!
California Penal Code Section 12026.2 actually lists lawful transportation situations, but doesn't say that such a list is exclusive to only those transportation situations which woul dnullify other interpretations of 12026 tranportation lawfulness such as transporting to a site where one plans to open carry. Well, I know I am good between home and work... which was the largest part of my concern moving into Cali as I may be working later evenings. It appears a hotel room would be a lawful destination since it is private propperty that is lawfully possessed, and it appears campsites without further restrictions would allow for lawful transportation... ugh... seriously this is confusing. You almost have to have a lawyer in your coat pocket just to defend yourself. This seriously cannot be what the founding fathers had in mind!