• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Coyotes and Lautenberg legislation

Dave Workman

Regular Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
, ,
‘Coyote Derby’ will help whitetail deer herd; Gun bills won’t help anybody


Evergreen State hunters interested in helping the whitetail deer herds north of Spokane (while driving Seattle-area animal rights advocates bonkers) should use this weekend to zero in their varmint rifles, because – according to a flyer circulating across the Internet – a month-long “Coyote Derby” is about to open with a Weatherby Vanguard .223-caliber rifle and scope combination being the grand prize.


http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-...tetail-deer-herd-gun-bills-won-t-help-anybody



Or try this:



http://tinyurl.com/4pt7lz8
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
This is like the "back and forth" that went on in Alaska during the '70's. First it was the animal rights activists that wanted the wolf hunts stopped. Then it was the Hunters that pointed out that the growing wolf packs were causing a decline in the Moose herds. When they started hunting the wolves again, then there were too many moose and everyone bitched about the damage they caused as they came into town and fed on gardens.

Now if we could just find a balance, just like Mother Nature used to take care of without human help.
 

FMCDH

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
2,037
Location
St. Louis, MO
<SNIP>

Now if we could just find a balance, just like Mother Nature used to take care of without human help.

That would require removing the human equation and letting things fall as they may, regardless of the effects on sporting or animal populations. Its far too late for that.

Nature doesn't always balance itself out to the satisfaction of man.
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
That would require removing the human equation and letting things fall as they may, regardless of the effects on sporting or animal populations. Its far too late for that.

Nature doesn't always balance itself out to the satisfaction of man.

You're right. It would probably require that we let some animals eat more people.
 
Last edited:

FMCDH

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
2,037
Location
St. Louis, MO
You're right. It would probably require that we let some animals eat more people.

Its bound to happen, with more and more human encroachment into animal habitats. Its especially noticeable in Alaska where there is so much more undisturbed and un-managed area from which animals move when conditions move them from one area to another.
 
Top