Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
...but I won't.
I am voting for President Obama...again; well, likely--I would say a 99% chance.
Now, on the off-chance that Paul runs Third Party, then I am throwing my lott to the cause.
Then that begs the question: What if Romney took Paul as the VP?
Answer: Then there would be a 49% chance that I would vote for Romney--I don't see Paul as being some sort of Dick Cheney type-of VP. I must say though, Paul seems a bit timid in his disposition, although, I am sure he isn't actually like that, but he seems a little Carteresque in appearance.
Sure, it can be argued that we know what President Obama is capable of, and the second term will be worse than the first; that of course is based on the premise that his first term was really that bad. Then again, Romney is no peach, IMO.
I suppose what I am stuck with here is a philosophical exercise that has to do with more than just one issue--Second Amendment. Now, the Second Amendment is something that I am in support of, and I whole-heartedly believe that when Obama states he believes the Constitution support the individual right to bear arms, I take him at what he says; that's not to state that I believe he wouldn't regulate, regulate, regulate--basically, push for something along the lines of an AWB II.
I wish that these political positions were as simple as cutting down the issue of the Second Amendment, but they aren't; at least not in my world.
But when we walk into that booth, or mail-in our vote, we are deciding which might be the lesser of two evils, and I wonder: What makes my vote for what I see as the 'lesser of two evils' in throwing it at President Obama and worse, or better for that matter, when the person next to me is throwing their vote to Romney, whom they think is the 'lesser of two evils'?
Good luck out there people. Be safe.
I am voting for President Obama...again; well, likely--I would say a 99% chance.
Now, on the off-chance that Paul runs Third Party, then I am throwing my lott to the cause.
Then that begs the question: What if Romney took Paul as the VP?
Answer: Then there would be a 49% chance that I would vote for Romney--I don't see Paul as being some sort of Dick Cheney type-of VP. I must say though, Paul seems a bit timid in his disposition, although, I am sure he isn't actually like that, but he seems a little Carteresque in appearance.
Sure, it can be argued that we know what President Obama is capable of, and the second term will be worse than the first; that of course is based on the premise that his first term was really that bad. Then again, Romney is no peach, IMO.
I suppose what I am stuck with here is a philosophical exercise that has to do with more than just one issue--Second Amendment. Now, the Second Amendment is something that I am in support of, and I whole-heartedly believe that when Obama states he believes the Constitution support the individual right to bear arms, I take him at what he says; that's not to state that I believe he wouldn't regulate, regulate, regulate--basically, push for something along the lines of an AWB II.
I wish that these political positions were as simple as cutting down the issue of the Second Amendment, but they aren't; at least not in my world.
But when we walk into that booth, or mail-in our vote, we are deciding which might be the lesser of two evils, and I wonder: What makes my vote for what I see as the 'lesser of two evils' in throwing it at President Obama and worse, or better for that matter, when the person next to me is throwing their vote to Romney, whom they think is the 'lesser of two evils'?
Good luck out there people. Be safe.
Last edited: