Gunbanobama.com

WalkingWolf said:

Gary Johnson is in favor of permission cards to carry, like a lot of politicians. They believe in letting people have a privilege instead of a right. There is nothing to indicate Johnson would be any better than Romney as far as the 2A. NONE of them recognize the purpose of the second amendment. All politicians play lip service, no cite needed for that. There have been a lot of governors that have signed POPULAR concealed carry laws, including anti gun governors. If he pushed and held out for no restrictions as to owning and carrying of firearms I might have a different opinion, but he did not.

Click to expand...

He asked for a cite, not a phrase backed by opinion! If you can't cite a statement with evidence that can be proven it is probably best not to try and make something seem to be fact, when it is mere speculation.

KYGlockster said:

He asked for a cite, not a phrase backed by opinion! If you can't cite a statement with evidence that can be proven it is probably best not to try and make something seem to be fact, when it is mere speculation.

Click to expand...

I don't need to provide a cite for an opinion. Plus Johnson, has not passed one law that restores the second amendment , that is a fact. If you have a cite to disprove it, please step up to the plate. Johnson IS helping Obama, and that will not be good for the second amendment, unless you think Obama has any intentions of restoring the 2A, if you do please provide a cite.

WalkingWolf said:

I don't need to provide a cite for an opinion. Plus Johnson, has not passed one law that restores the second amendment , that is a fact. If you have a cite to disprove it, please step up to the plate. Johnson IS helping Obama, and that will not be good for the second amendment, unless you think Obama has any intentions of restoring the 2A, if you do please provide a cite.

Click to expand...

So is Romney, he's dooming the Republican bid for the whitehouse. Everyday that goes by, his ratings drop that much more. It's like he WANTS Obama to win. Which honestly wouldn't surprise me, seeing as how he supports the Democrat agenda so heavily.

Jack House said:

So is Romney, he's dooming the Republican bid for the whitehouse. Everyday that goes by, his ratings drop that much more. It's like he WANTS Obama to win. Which honestly wouldn't surprise me, seeing as how he supports the Democrat agenda so heavily.

Click to expand...

He is who republicans chose by voting in primaries, some people would agree with, some do not. I suggest learning to accept that people will disagree with you. Mostly because you cannot do anything about it. You can make a choice like anybody else and accept responsibility if that choice bites you in the asss. Or you can go about whining about it.

WalkingWolf said:

Let's add in he is not honest, he is a republican running in a libertarian ticket, he is only saying what any politician would say running on that ticket. Not to mention there is no way in hell he has a chance of getting elected. IMO he is actively campaigning for Obama, because any support he does get will further cement Obama. I hope America enjoyed their rights, not just the 2A. Obama made it clear in his remarks to Putin what he intends.

Click to expand...

Lots of pro-marijuana Republicans? Lots of pro-gay marriage Republicans? Lots of anti-Patriot Act, NDAA indefinite detention Republicans? Lots of anti-police the world Republicans?

Newsflash: Republicans are the reason things like the Patriot Act and indefinite detention and electronic wiretapping without a warrant exist. They've been taking your rights away for years, and now when they push for "anyone but constitutionalist and veteran and small-government guy Ron Paul" and give you Romney, the best thing you can say about Romney is that he's not Obama.

If Romney gets hammered in November, the neocons will have to change their ways or else be content with the fact that they WILL NEVER WIN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AGAIN. Even Rush Limbaugh and other right-wing commentators have said to shut down the party if it can't beat Obama with his record.

Santorum said Romney is the worst person on the planet to put up against Obama. The Republican establishment was warned Romney would have big problems winning. During the campaigns, Republicans were "anyone but Romney."

It's unfortunate, but probably the best thing that can happen to liberty is for Obama to have four more years. The big-government neocons need to be purged from the Republican Party. Hell, most of Romney's staff are Bush people. Don't these idiots ever get fired?

Btw, Ron Paul was nominated at the Republican convention. The six states nominating him turned in their paperwork, and they videoed it. The RNC then ignored that paperwork. Watch all the underhanded things that happened at the Republican convention. "RNC Sham 2012." The Republican Party and RNC showed how dirty they can be and how they treat their own delegates and candidates. The Republican convention looked like a dictatorship. They were showing people what they would be like if Romney wins, only they'd be 10x worse. And I'm supposed to vote for that? I don't think so.

Also, Romney is doing so badly on his own that even if everyone voting for Johnson or writing in Paul would vote for Romney, he'd still likely lose. He's simply a lousy candidate. Everyone knew he was a lousy candidate, and everyone knows he is a lousy candidate. But the establishment would rather have Obama win than Ron Paul win, so they pushed for and gave you Romney. Blame them. Blame everyone who pushed for Mitt Romney -- the worst candidate on the planet.

Jack House said:

So is Romney, he's dooming the Republican bid for the whitehouse. Everyday that goes by, his ratings drop that much more. It's like he WANTS Obama to win. Which honestly wouldn't surprise me, seeing as how he supports the Democrat agenda so heavily.

Click to expand...

I think you might be on to something. He Romney did start out pro-democrat. Has proven to be a gun grabber and created socialistic healthcare. He also seems to be flip-flopping on every issue out there. It seems impossible at this point that he could get elected.

DangerClose said:

But the establishment would rather have Obama win than Ron Paul win, so they pushed for and gave you Romney. Blame them. Blame everyone who pushed for Mitt Romney -- the worst candidate on the planet.

Click to expand...

Of course they would. Individual freedom and loss of federal power is much more of a threat then the hardly distinguishable line between "R"s and "D"s.
Of course they want to have their "letter" on the WH door, but it's way way secondary to keeping the statues-quo and furthering totalitarianism is the US.

scott58dh said:

I believe that all of you are missing the most important point of this election.

When the Republicans take over the White House, then the chances of having Conservative Appointees to The SCOTUS are much more likely than a Ron (Ross Perot clone) Paul, Johnson or whoever fill the POTUS.
]

Click to expand...

What if you don't want a conservative appointee? What if you want an appointee that will protect the rights of individual liberty?

scott58dh said:

Remember, we are Voting SCOTUS 4 President :exclaim::exclaim:

Click to expand...

Absolutely right, and if Romney pulled a miracle out of his ass and won the White House, all he'd do is appoint another Sotomayor/Kagan.

I find it odd how the SCOTUS for president people all hoot and hollar about how Obama is going to appoint people that matches his true political agenda, rather than what he claims. Yet somehow miraculously expect Mitt Romney to do the complete opposite. Romney is bad for guns but his political appointees will be good? Like how Obama is bad for guns but his appointees were good?

Do you honestly believe the dribble that Romney is going to appoint a rights protecting Justice?

By TownHall

While President Obama exhorts Americans to support tax hikes on high income individuals, families and businesses, he could stand to look inside the halls of the White House for some extra revenue.

Andrew Malcolm over at Investor's Business Daily points us to the hard numbers: three dozen Obama executive advisers and aides owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in back taxes - and federal workers as a whole owe the IRS $3.4 billion in unpaid taxes.

A new report just out from the Internal Revenue Service reveals that 36 of President Obama's executive office staff owe the country $833,970 in back taxes. These people working for Mr. Fair Share apparently haven't paid any share, let alone their fair share.

Previous reports have shown how well-paid Obama's White House staff is, with 457 aides pulling down more than $37 million last year. That's up seven workers and nearly $4 million from the Bush administration's last year.

Nearly one-third of Obama's aides make more than $100,000 with 21 being paid the top White House salary of $172,200, each.

The IRS' 2010 delinquent tax revelations come as part of a required annual agency report on federal employees' tax compliance. Turns out, an awful lot of folks being paid by taxpayers are not paying their own income taxes.

The report finds that thousands of federal employees owe the country more than $3.4 billion in back taxes. That's up 3% in the past year.

http://nation.foxnews.com/taxes/2012/07/23/obama-tax-cheats#ixzz28AbEKGP4