davidmcbeth
Banned
Thanks Rich ... 21K is nothing really .. but its something ...
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
42 USC 1983 claim possible? Let me know your thoughts :)
- Thread starter davidmcbeth
- Start date
Thanks Rich ... 21K is nothing really .. but its something ...
Rich B
Regular Member
I don't understand your question. How exactly do you think the court would 'reprimand' individual officers?
Rich B
Regular Member
As with anything, the decision is generally more important than the $$$.
self preservation
Regular Member
Not the courts..the departments.
Rich B
Regular Member
How would anyone know what discipline is handed down from the departments and why would departments discipline officers when it was likely their lack of training and/or supervision that cost them the case in the first place?
self preservation
Regular Member
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclien...pw.r_qf.&fp=58cd1a128b75a554&biw=1440&bih=755
Sometimes PD's take responsibility for their officers actions.
Rich B
Regular Member
Sometimes I eat pork on a Sunday. The two things have no relation.
self preservation
Regular Member
If you say so. You ask how we would know if an officer got in trouble by his dept. for his actions. And as I pointed out, it's not always a secret. I was just curious about the whole outcome...not just how much money this guy got.