• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sb656

L

logunowner

Regular Member
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
219
Location
Lake Ozark, Mo
The Truth said:
So wait, you guys can only carry with a permit, CC or OC?
Click to expand...


As far a SB656 is concerned, the only thing that has changed in Missouri is if a city had banned open carry, as of 10-12.14 that city can no longer ban the practice as long as the person has a CCW.
 
The Truth

The Truth

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
1,972
Location
Henrico
Well I guess that's better than nothing...seems unconstitutional to require permission to carry like that.
 
OC for ME

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
The truth is that MO is a OC state, no permission required. RSMo 21.750.3 provides for a political subdivision to regulate OC. Some town were OC with a permit already. Some towns OC is a no no. Most towns do not address OC at all, so OC is OK. Not much different that VA actually.
 
P

plumberdan

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
10
Location
st,louis
wasnt part of 656 including provision for leo falsly removing ur weapon?

OC for ME said:
The truth is that MO is a OC state, no permission required. RSMo 21.750.3 provides for a political subdivision to regulate OC. Some town were OC with a permit already. Some towns OC is a no no. Most towns do not address OC at all, so OC is OK. Not much different that VA actually.
Click to expand...

I thought part of new 656 provided a financial penalty if a leo removed your weapon or detained unlawfully

in reading text did not not see that part? was it removed or did I just miss it? and if there is a penalty what is it and how do u

find it? thanks...someone more versed than me please respond...would like to make hand out card with quotes for uninformed leo's
 
K

kcgunfan

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
1,002
Location
KC
There is no penalty, there might have been one in previous versions, but it's toothless now.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
OC for ME

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Arrest. 544.180. An arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person of the defendant, or by his submission to the custody of the officer, under authority of a warrant or otherwise. The officer must inform the defendant by what authority he acts, and must also show the warrant if required.

Resisting or interfering with arrest--penalty. 575.150. 1. A person commits the crime of resisting or interfering with arrest, detention, or stop if, knowing that a law enforcement officer is making an arrest, or attempting to lawfully detain or stop an individual or vehicle, or the person reasonably should know that a law enforcement officer is making an arrest or attempting to lawfully detain or lawfully stop an individual or vehicle, for the purpose of preventing the officer from effecting the arrest, stop or detention, the person:

4. It is no defense to a prosecution pursuant to subsection 1 of this section that the law enforcement officer was acting unlawfully in making the arrest. However, nothing in this section shall be construed to bar civil suits for unlawful arrest.
Click to expand...
Cops may claim that they "believed" that you broke "a law" to justify the "officer safety" = confiscate pistol.
 
K

kcgunfan

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
1,002
Location
KC
In this case, belief is not sufficient. RAS is required. So, if an officer merely believes me to have broken a law, disarms me, that's a civil suit for him.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top