MKEgal
Regular Member
A female clueless about state gun laws and on a power trip when ever she can trump a man.
Wow. Angry with women much?
Replace that with black & white for female & man & see how far that would fly.
A female clueless about state gun laws and on a power trip when ever she can trump a man.
Wow. Angry with women much?
Replace that with black & white for female & man & see how far that would fly.
Fix'dThere's a solution:
Start a nation-wide Wal-Mart boycott on the basis of their nebulous non-response, citing the "Debbies out there who refuse to respect our Constitutional rights." State that the boycott will remain in effect until Wal-Mart both make clear their policy commensurate with U.S. and State law, and educate each and every manager and assistant manager as to Wal-Mart Corporate Policy, which should read, in toto:"Wal-Mart has no policy against people carrying their handgun in our stores as long as he/she is legally permitted by their state to do so."No additions.
Should readStart a nation-wide Wal-Mart boycott on the basis of their nebulous non-response, citing the "Debbies out there who refuse to respect our Constitutional rights."
That would get better reception, since it is their right to deny you access to their store on any grounds they so choose.Start a nation-wide Wal-Mart boycott on the basis of their nebulous non-response, citing the "Debbies out there who refuse to respect their law abiding customers."
Wow. Angry with women much?
Replace that with black & white for female & man & see how far that would fly.
OP's problem revolves around store managers like this Debbie. A female clueless about state gun laws and on a power trip when ever she can trump a man.
A letter from Walmart corporate on store policy following state gun law might put her in her place.
Kindly keep us informed.
No one, except the most overly sensitive, would assume that you only meant women when you said "the Debbies." I assumed that you simply meant people who think and act like Debbie, knee-jerking in an irrational, emotional, hateful, and unproductive way.
There is nothing insensitive with anything you have written.
I for one will adopt the term "a Debbie" for that kind of person, regardless of sex. It's the attitude that I will be mocking.
A female clueless about state gun laws...
on a power trip when ever she can trump a man.
might put her in her place
Fix'd
PS:
Should read
That would get better reception, since it is their right to deny you access to their store on any grounds they so choose.
If someone tries to make stupid claims about gun owners, just point out the innumerous cases where armed LACs helped to protect Wal~Mart's interests. Such as the armed LAC that saved the life of that woman that worked in the deli.
I would also like to see movements to secure rights for customers to carry their side arms concealed while at work and for employee policies regarding firearms to not apply to employees that are off the clock.
{since it is their right to deny you access to their store on any grounds thay so choose.} Let me get this right you are saying as a business owner I could stop you from shopping at my store for no other reson then "lets say" your BLACK or maby MORMON! Please tell me how that works.
Ahhh. It was my fault, eye.
I misread your reply. It appeared to me that you were trying to absolve GWBiker of the previous exchange outlined in my spur of the moment rant.
After rereading, I see where you simply cleared the air with SFC.
I apologize for accusing you of "walking past victims". I agree with you on what you said to SFC. I did not see anything offensive in his posts.
You cannot lawfully deny access based on membership in a protected class. You may deny access for virtually ANY other reason--including carry, unless there is a specific State law prohibiting such.
Property owners in most States do have the RIGHT to deny access to carriers. If we expect our rights to be respected, we ought to respect the rights of others.
So if i`m black or female i`m` a protected class what an insalt!! BUT if I exercise a God given right protected by the Constitution who cares! Thats why we are looked down on. Maby its` time for people who beleave in the Constitution to be a Protected Class!
I respect you for putting a kind face on it, eye. It's nice of you to offer excuses as to what may or may not be the case in an attempt to keep the peace. But you have mistakenly offered to speak for others when you say "No one, except the most overly sensitive..". I'm not overly sensitive. I can see it. It's as plain as the nose on my face. What I am, is willing to call a horse "a horse". Turning a blind eye has never been one of my characteristics. Doing so only leads to the disgusting and despicable behavior we all have seen in stories about folks getting beaten and robbed while bystanders walk by on their cell phones minding their own business. It is this tendency for folks to turn a blind eye that offenders rely on in order to continue absolving themselves of their own inadequate humanity. Right is right. Wrong is wrong. Those "No one's, except the most overly sensitive's" you refer to are the same as the cell phone talkers purposefully ignoring the pools of blood they're walking through.
Evidently, a female clueless about state gun laws is comlpletely different than anyone else that does so, right? Otherwise, why emphasize the sex? Why isn't it just a person. Or a manager? Or...any other adjective?
Nope. It's specifically a FEMALE.
There's a good one. Evidently, it's not about the incident. It's about power. Who's power? The evil man hating FEMALE. Everyone knows those pesky females never pass up an opportunity to...what was it.."trump a man"?
And here I thought we were simply talking about an incident in Wal-Mart. Is this the sound of a discussion on OC? Where did the "power trips" by females and "trumping men" come into it? Maybe you can cast your eyes away from the fists landing on the victim as you dial your phone and walk by, but I won't.
How many nails does the coffin need?
Maybe GWBiker can kindly inform us as to what "place" this female needs to be put in? Maybe that's the same place the TROLL needs to be put in, huh? I think I'll go join her there. Wherever that place is, I have a feeling the people there won't pass me by if I am beaten to the sidewalk. Those of us who refuse to avert our eyes kind of like it there.
I agree with Eye95, as a private property owner, you should have the right to deny anyone access for any reason you so choose, regardless of how unpopular that reason may be.
I thought we were pretty clear with Wal Mart until tonight. I was confronted by an assistant manager and three of the most thuggish-looking individuals I've seen in a long time. The manager asked me if I was a cop and, when I replied in the negative, informed me in the snottiest manner possible that they did not allow any firearms in their stores.
Has Wal Mart changed their policy? I've sent an email to corporate and tomorrow I will try to talk to a manager.
This is the first time I've been told to leave a Wal Mart. I didn't mind being told to leave as much as I minded her snotty manner and the three thugs (if I called them what want to, I'd be banned), apparently some kind of loss prevention, that were with her.
I won't go back into that store until I get a definitive answer from either corporate or from a manager at that store.
You cannot lawfully deny access based on membership in a protected class. You may deny access for virtually ANY other reason--including carry, unless there is a specific State law prohibiting such.
Property owners in most States do have the RIGHT to deny access to carriers. If we expect our rights to be respected, we ought to respect the rights of others.
{since it is their right to deny you access to their store on any grounds thay so choose.} Let me get this right you are saying as a business owner I could stop you from shopping at my store for no other reson then "lets say" your BLACK or maby MORMON! Please tell me how that works.
You cannot lawfully deny access based on membership in a protected class. You may deny access for virtually ANY other reason--including carry, unless there is a specific State law prohibiting such.
Property owners in most States do have the RIGHT to deny access to carriers. If we expect our rights to be respected, we ought to respect the rights of others.
But the property owner (Wal-mart) does not exclude gun owners, and as a representative of the owner, their managers shouldn't have discretionary control over company policy such as this.