Doug Huffman
Banned
The Logic of Scientific Discovery by Karl Popper, Verlag von Julius Springer, 1935
.Karl Popper said:I do not think positivists are likely to respond any differently to my own attempts to analyze 'experience' which I interpret as the method of empirical science. For only two kinds of statement exist for them: logical tautologies and empirical statements. If methodology is not logic, then, they will conclude, it must be a branch of some empirical science -- the science, say, of the behavior of scientists at work.
This view, according to which methodology is an empirical science in its turn -- a study of the actual behavior of scientists, or of the actual procedure of 'science' -- may be described as 'naturalistic'. A naturalistic methodology (sometimes called an 'inductive theory of science') has its value, no doubt. A student of the logic of science may well take an interest in it, and learn from it. But what I call 'methodology' should not be taken for empirical science. I do not believe that it is possible to decide, by using the methods of an empirical science, such controversial questions as whether science actually uses a principal of induction or not. And my doubts increase when I remember that what is to be called a 'science' and who is to be called a 'scientist' must always remain a matter of convention or decision.[DH emphasis]