With an amendment from Rep Dorworth to bastardize the bill into the same text as the Senate version:
http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0517/Amendment/989561/HTML
...and another amendment to allow certain public officials with a CWFL to carry in gubmint meetings (from Patronis).
Not adopted I assume? If it were, we could kill this demon spawn of a bill.
Ok this is new language and a new amendment. This is a different read on things. They seemed to have removed some of the ambiguous language. This may be interesting. It says you can briefly openly display a firearm as long as your intention is to carry it concealed. The “briefly” is questionable but it is not near as ambiguous as accidentally or inadvertently. Am I reading something wrong? So If I'm getting into my truck and I take my jacket off before I get in and my weapon becomes visible I am not in violation. Before if I took my coat off in such a manner then the exposure was not accidental or inadvertent and I was subject to arrest. This is interesting..
1) http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0234/Amendment/688734/HTML New language
2) http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0234/Amendment/322294/HTML Old language
New Language:
It
12 is not a violation of this section for a person licensed to
13 carry a concealed firearm as provided in s. 790.06(1), and who
14 is lawfully carrying a firearm in a concealed manner, to briefly
15 and openly display the firearm to the ordinary sight of another
16 person, unless the firearm is intentionally displayed in an
17 angry or threatening manner, not in necessary self-defense.
Old Lanquage:
It
11 shall not be a violation of this section for a person who is
12 licensed to carry a concealed firearm, and who is lawfully
13 carrying it in a concealed manner, to accidentally or
14 inadvertently display the firearm to the ordinary sight of
15 another person so long as the firearm is not displayed in a
16 rude, angry, or threatening manner.
Ok this is new language and a new amendment. This is a different read on things. They seemed to have removed some of the ambiguous language. This may be interesting. It says you can briefly openly display a firearm as long as your intention is to carry it concealed. The “briefly” is questionable but it is not near as ambiguous as accidentally or inadvertently. Am I reading something wrong? So If I'm getting into my truck and I take my jacket off before I get in and my weapon becomes visible I am not in violation. Before if I took my coat off in such a manner then the exposure was not accidental or inadvertent and I was subject to arrest. This is interesting..
1) http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0234/Amendment/688734/HTML New language
2) http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0234/Amendment/322294/HTML Old language
New Language:
It
12 is not a violation of this section for a person licensed to
13 carry a concealed firearm as provided in s. 790.06(1), and who
14 is lawfully carrying a firearm in a concealed manner, to briefly
15 and openly display the firearm to the ordinary sight of another
16 person, unless the firearm is intentionally displayed in an
17 angry or threatening manner, not in necessary self-defense.
Old Lanquage:
It
11 shall not be a violation of this section for a person who is
12 licensed to carry a concealed firearm, and who is lawfully
13 carrying it in a concealed manner, to accidentally or
14 inadvertently display the firearm to the ordinary sight of
15 another person so long as the firearm is not displayed in a
16 rude, angry, or threatening manner.
Boyer, KMA dude. You are ignored so I have no idea what your saying. I can't imagine its anything nice towards me so you don't need to waste you time if it is.
Boyer, KMA dude. You are ignored so I have no idea what your saying. I can't imagine its anything nice towards me so you don't need to waste you time if it is.
Yea, that's what Crisafulli told me the other day and that they were changing it to that before it came to the house.He was pointing out that the new language is a week old.
I'm crushed!
If you would not open your mouth and spew uninformed information, that some other less informed individual might taker to heart, I, and others, would not have to continually come and correct you.
He was pointing out that the new language is a week old.
"uninformed "
Here we go again. For the last time. Inform us, O Gatekeeper of All-Knowing Knowledge and Wisdom, inform we feeble-minded masses...
...ya, somehow I didnt think you could, either.
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: