protias said:
Often fools don't know they are fools.
Last night I had quite a long conversation w/ my information source, & from what he said of their attitude, this fits 100%. They don't even admit they need help.
labomba said:
If the rules require any revision to certifications already issued, etc. it's going to be a scramble.
As IK pointed out, instructors can issue stickers with any 'required' wording.
I still think it'd be simpler to teach the people processing the applications what the law says is acceptable.
I don't think DOJ is deliberately trying to obstruct Act 35.
I do.
Their law specialists (lawyers) don't seem to be able to read the plain English of the law as well as we normal people can.
They seem determined to make implementation of this law as difficult & costly as possible for the citizens of WI.
The latest thing I'm told they're going to try to require are a photo & fingerprints.
The law says they can't*,
the law doesn't say those are required**,
but they'll try.
*
175.60(2)(b)
The department may not impose conditions, limitations, or requirements that are not expressly provided for in this section on the issuance, scope, effect, or content of a license.
**
175.60(2)(m)(b)
A license document for a license issued under this section shall contain all of the following on one side:
1. The full name, date of birth, and residence address of the licensee.
2. A physical description of the licensee, including sex, height, and eye color.
3. The date on which the license was issued.
4. The date on which the license expires.
5. The name of this state.
6. A unique identification number for each licensee
**
175.60(5)(a)
The forms shall require the applicant to provide
only his or her name, address, date of birth, state identification card number, race, sex, height, and eye color...