I'm well familiar with that law. It's cited in any thread about trespassing, and appropriately so.
Its basis is that going on or remaining on property after having been told not to (i.e. told to keep out or to leave) is trespassing. I'm wondering how you drew the conclusion that one can be trespassing without having been told to keep out or to leave.
It's in black and white and easy to understand Mark....but it has been argued over and over. There's no sense in that because everyone is entitled to their opinion.
My advice to anyone that feels what is written is different than what is...is to follow their own instincts, carry User's card and don't call me for bail!:lol:
The idea is to give people good examples of the law, not suppositions or jailhouse interpretations. We have enough problems when we obey the law such as Scouser or Skidmark. Giving members here the idea that they can not be arrested for bringing a gun into an establishment after being forbidden to, is irresponsible at best.
Saying that a no guns sign is only a suggestion is the same as the joke I make about Dog Hunters thinking No Trespassing is French for welcome.
Last edited: