OC for ME
Regular Member
Like DiFi gave a rat's rear end about Ms. Miller and her reporting. DiFi has Mr. Holder and Obama watching her back.....nuff said.
Prosecution via bad laws benefits no one.
If we would defend a pro-gunnie for inadvertently having one piece of spent brass in his cup holder because he had no ill intent, so to must we extend the hand of fairness to all.
Like DiFi gave a rat's rear end about Ms. Miller and her reporting. DiFi has Mr. Holder and Obama watching her back.....nuff said.
Inane? :lol::lol:
Also, I would not be arrested. Why should I be? I have have handguns etc in DC before w/o incident.
See, I live in America ...
It's their opinion that its illegal, not mine. They are wrong. I don't need guys in robs telling me that. And I sold hundreds of handguns to folks in Chgo when they had their anti-handgun laws. Look, I'm still free...
When I have issues I consult my legal firm of Smith & Wesson.
Thanks for the english lesson, I will be sure to put spelling and grammer errors in all my post from now on as to stroke your ego as an english teacher. I hope you feel better about yourself.
It's "grammar" not "grammer," and "English" not "english." Just trying to help ... and I felt fine about myself before your comment.
I long ago realized I wouldn't have any friends if I corrected every mistake I notice.
In fact, I tend to throw in a few intentional errors for the same reason.
(That's my story and I'm sticking with it.)
The fact that you were not caught, charged, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned does not make your actions -- if they were real and not just keyboard commando fictions -- any less illegal.
It's "grammar" not "grammer," and "English" not "english." Just trying to help ... and I felt fine about myself before your comment.
We must certainly advocate for a change in the laws that affect our rights ... but we must not break the law in order to do so. By charging the "elite" when they break the law we are gaining additional publicity as to the unfairness of the law. This board, I believe, says that we must not endorse law breaking in order to achieve our worthy ends. Thus, while we work hard to repeal laws with which we disagree, we must insist, at least, that they be applied equally to all, or to none at all.
Emily Miller on 'Morning Joe' with Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski
"Where would you draw the line?"
"What about a bazooka?"
"I want a machine-gun to defend my family -- what about that?"
That's easy. Bazooka, machine-gun - cost of ammo too high, inefficient.
Ah, a Letter of Marque. Great for framing on your wall. Now a Cheque to go with it would be the thing!There are many examples from US history that illustrate the fact that weapons of war (including cannon and armed naval vessels) owned by common citizens was not seen as either unusual or alarming. In fact, the nascent government explicitly commissioned such vessels during the Revolutionary War. See this link for details: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1991/5/cj11n1-8.pdf.
Also, unless it's been repealed w/out my knowledge, the US Constitution still allows for this sort of thing. See, for example Article I, Sec. 8 cl. 11:
"The Congress shall have Power To ... declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; ... "
Letters of Marque and Reprisal grant to individuals the right to engage in activities that would normally be considered piracy. That such actions are (usually) reserved for Navy Seals and other SpecOps types does not mean that the government does not, on occasion, commission private forces to do its dirty work for it.
^^^ Useless, inane reply to the use of a legal term. And it's "cite," not "site."
Guess we can cite the site..... :banana:
Please cite where a responsible court has declared DC law to be unconstitutional, keeping in mind that Heller only overturned that portion of DC law that made keeping a handgun in one's home illegal.
It might be that in your opinion the DC laws against possessing certain classes, makes or models of firearms outside one's home are unconstitutional, but until a competent court makes that ruling your opinion is just more spitting into the wind.