Redbaron007
Regular Member
That's a weak claim to make, and does nothing to support any argument based on evidence in the case. That is called ad hominem. It might not be fallacious, that is for you to prove, but that doesn't make it a strong argument.
Sure! This has nothing to do with the fact that Brown died X number of feet away from the cruiser, witnesses claim he ran, then turned around and surrendered with his hands raised - and physical evidence does not unequivocally refute these claims - and Brown was unarmed. You're right, everyone that wants Wilson to be prosecuted is just ignorant, blind cop haters.
No, just no.
Facts are, Brown as a result of gunshot wounds. After that, you (not The Truth directly) have allegedly witnesses saying things that support both sides, plus we haven't heard from all witnesses their story...only those the media and the Browns' family have chosen to release. As of now, a lot of the facts are not public......we do not know what the GJ is seeing. As with the Zimmerman trial....lots of opinions based upon media info (some were accurate than others) but in this case, it's hard to determine anything.