Here ya go, wrightme, I will do something I probably shouldn't do: cite Wilson's statements for you. The reason I'm doing so is because you REFUSE to do so because you know it does nothing to strengthen the argument for deadly force after the initial contact. It's pretty clear when you are replying almost immediately, providing cites for various other claims in other threads without question, but when asked to provide a cite for this claim you refuse.
Also, this came out two days ago and something tells me you weren't even aware before making your initial statement since if you were aware of the new reports you likely would have posted them. This is the first official public release of this info. It was released Friday 10/17.
"Wilson’s statement also fails to explain why he shot Brown several times after he got out of his car."
http://www.newsweek.com/officer-dar...ichael-brown-shooting-report-278364?piano_t=1
It fails to explain the second burst of shots because there is no explanation.
Lethal force after the initial contact is not justified in my opinion, and Wilson's statements support my claim, because he gives no explanation.
I don't expect any justice though. I'm pretty cynical.