Thanks for calling gun owners felons instead of people who own guns that are legal under what SCOTUS.
Lanza had guns that are not banned that could have done the same as the rifle (if he even used the rifle~I have seen no proof of that) on him. Did he use the handguns to kill or the rifle? No evidence is shown either way.
What would I have said:
The state now bans rifles that SCOTUS has expressly stated that we can own and possess.
The state has stated that registration of guns, the disclosure of what arms a person owns, creates a risk of death to those that disclose or register.
The state will now check this list when police come over to address minor issues like a loud party of your kids when you are out of town on business and will respond with SWAT teams descending upon a neighborhood putting children at risk and given that SWAT teams historically go to the wrong house about 5% of the time, everyone should be concerned.
And to inform people that jury nullification is permissible in this state and ask that none of the viewers find anyone guilty in any prosecution under these draconian and illegal gun laws. Because under our law, it is the people who are the final arbiters of laws - we decide what laws are enforceable, not legislators and not judges and it is the cornerstone of why we have juries and that juries consist of the people, not the government.
