• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Ron Paul on Guns

Doug Huffman

Jun 9, 2006
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

More on RP and Heinlein...


I don’t know who wrote the question, but finally, somebody (besides me) made the point that nearly everything in The P4ulian’s platform falls outside the Executive powers outlined by the Constitution. Hear, hear! The question? Given that, how exactly do you plan to implement yours?

You’d think The P4ulian would have read the Constitution. Apparently, he has not — or only the Cliff’s Notes.

By the way, he danced around the question, rather than answering it.
from a RightWingNation thread...

Beyond this point, science fiction has a long and proud tradition of irascible loners with contrary politics, and there are more of them than you think. I doubt there’s a single Ron Paul supporter in the land who doesn’t have a well-thumbed copy of either Farnham’s Freehold or The Moon is a Harsh Mistress or both. Being politically incorrect is not actually a liability in science fiction.
I have a worn The Exhaustive Concordance to The United States Constitution, edited by Dennis Bizzoco (Firm Foundation Press, Chattanooga, 1994) and a well-thumbed Farnham's Freehold.