Wow
http://www.southcarolinacriminaldefenseblog.com/2009/03/holding_police_and_prosecutors_1.html
Letter to the Prosecutor, July 5, 2010
On July 5, 2010, a man on the 29000 block of Parkwood around 1:20 a.m, in Inkster Michigan, shoots and kills a man who “he claimed” was an intruder. It is amazing how the police always believe the story of a man with the gun, who just killed someone, over a dead man. The story makes no sense at all. The Inkster man claims the intruder was armed with a gun, but was an extremely lousy shot. The Inkster homeowner, shoots the alleged intruder dead and fired several rounds of ammunition through his window, endangering the lives of neighborhood children. The homeowner could have protected his home with rubber bullets, but he chose to use lethal ones. Because the homeowner believes, if the man he shot lives, he might have a justifiable reason for being in his home. Like he was drunk and had the wrong home. The prosecutor must charge the homeowner with murder and child endangerment. You have a right to protect your home, but you do not have the right to use a lethal weapon, when a rubber bullet would have been more than sufficient. The Constitution says every man has a right to a fair trial and is innocent until proven guilty. But this homeowner shot a man dead, without a trial, without a jury and without a judge. We just assume that the dead man was an intruder, because the murderer says he was. A dead man cannot talk. The murderer knows this, and uses it to his advantage. There is no justifiable rationalization to kill someone. Not even if someone is in your home or threatening your life, because you could have used a rubber bullet. This homeowner knew he was risking the lives of neighborhood children, by firing his lethal weapon. The homeowner knew his weapon could kill someone and he also knew he couldn’t used a rubber bullet to stop any intruder. The neighbors in this Inkster neighborhood, have a constitutional right, to kill this homeowner, if they believe this homeowner might be risking their lives of their children, by his using a lethal weapon and firing it through the walls and windows of his home. It is the 12 jurors that decide if killing this homeowner is justifiable in self defense, to protect their children, in case this gun nut, starts firing his gun again at “alleged intruders”. There is no proof that the dead man was threatening the homeowner’s life, or that he was even an intruder. But there is plenty of proof, this homeowner fired a lethal weapon, risking the lives of neighborhood children and also killing a man without a trial, without a judge and without a jury, when he could have used rubber bullets.
Timothy
Fraser MI 48026
1-248-906-4634
Posted by:
Timothy Allen Campbell |
July 5, 2010 7:27 PM
